Sorry, I missed that you already added pkg-message.in. Looks good.

A pkg message for upgrades would also be helpful. People tend not to go out of their way to read UPDATING, but they might read a note when they do the package upgrade.

lgtm. It might be helpful to link to https://imapsync.lamiral.info/ChangeLog in the commit message so users can easily see what's changed since 2.290.

I rebased this on top of 5c22d5b7a120ba4aad20ebaf9a4d5492136f640c (java/openjdk11: honour MAKE_JOBS_NUMBER) and tested the build. It finished on main, but failed on 14.3.

Incorporate @emaste's suggestion.

@andrew, it will be the same situation now when we have to choose whether to list MFC candidates for stable/14 or stable/15 by default. If I understood our IRC conversation correctly, you requested mfc-candidates be updated to tell you your stable/15 MFC candidates by default. This change does that and will automatically do it for stable/16 as soon as stable/17 is tagged.

Add a comment before the git command that extracts the latest stable branch.

Thanks for doing this.

If it's easier, I can fix that on commit.

The amd64 builds on the quarterly branch look good.

In D52402#1199726, @mark_freebsdfoundation.org wrote:

Hmm, I've just installed 15-ALPHA2 - and the installer correctly didn't use these slow, large, fonts on my Framework 13 AMD test machine. But once installed the system is back to using these infuriatingly slow fonts.

Committed in 5e82eeccd252e96370e8b73603b609622497000c. (Forgot to put the darn review URL in the commit log.)

Oh, sorry. One can't add screen.font=32x64 to /boot/loader.conf to get the Spleen fonts? I really can't tell much of a difference between the fonts on my system.

In D52402#1196630, @ziaee wrote:

Everyone has to loose features because something doesn't work on one specific model of laptop? Since when do we do that? Shouldn't the people using that specific model of laptop fix their issue?

Is forcing everyone else to have the loader crammed into a corner by removing the font the logic wants to select reasonable ?

Follow tsoome's suggestion.

Ok. I'll do that instead.

Mentor approval given Mark reviewed and approved this.

Sort MESON_ARGS values

What am I missing?

Same.

Looks good.

@michaelo, have you heard back from Kashyap Desai?

Commented on the bug report.

Looks good to me. It would be good to hear from someone rust.