User Details
- User Since
- Nov 2 2014, 4:37 PM (571 w, 22 h)
Tue, Sep 30
Thu, Sep 18
Seems fine to me. I haven't tested at all, just reviewed the change on Phab. Everything here makes as much sense as I can make out of it (take that for what you will :-)
Wed, Sep 17
Looking at what should be in the legacy provider, I fell down this rabbit hole by looking at a completely stock build of 3.5.4-dev on my Mac (I should probably check on a FreeBSD system and see if it is any different, but that would require a small amount of effort and I'm about to go to a dinner) and see this list as the primary objects that end up in the legacy provider:
Tue, Sep 16
How did you come up with these changes? What was the methodology that got this changeset?
Aug 8 2025
Jul 2 2025
Jul 1 2025
May 16 2025
May 12 2025
I’m not entirely sure what kind of approval from secteam is being sought. If someone in core would like to help me understand what kind of review is expected, I’d be happy to undertake it.
Apr 11 2025
Apr 10 2025
Feb 21 2025
Jan 30 2025
Jan 29 2025
As long as it doesn't end up as a build product, makes sense to me. Want to update the review with a new patch and we'll go from there?
Jan 12 2025
Nov 13 2024
Oct 29 2024
Sep 20 2024
Sep 19 2024
Sep 17 2024
Sep 8 2024
Sep 7 2024
Assuming this is a straight import, LGTM.