Approved, thanks!
- Queries
- All Stories
- Search
- Advanced Search
- Transactions
- Transaction Logs
Advanced Search
Apr 2 2026
Apr 1 2026
previous comments applied to the text
Mar 31 2026
Well done. Thanks a lot, vladlen!
all proposed changes applied
Mar 30 2026
three small corrections, otherwise looks good, thank you
Feb 23 2026
Oct 5 2025
Oct 4 2025
Thanks! Approved once the mailto macro is used
Sep 30 2025
considered all comments from the team
Sep 29 2025
All comments from team members are considered. It final version
Sep 28 2025
It looks good.
Changes are done according to comments.
Thank you for your submission. A few updates suggested for syntax fixes.
Sep 27 2025
Jul 15 2025
Jul 12 2025
Approved, thanks!
Jul 10 2025
Jul 6 2025
Jul 3 2025
Fix: pane(s) -> panel(s)
Jul 1 2025
Feb 14 2025
Yes, this information is in other report entries, so this can be closed.
I am a bit confused about this review (that I had totally forgotten, sorry).
Does it actually need to be merged? These reports are very short and do not add much to the other reports we already have. In particular we already have a clusteradm report and, hopefully, @lwhsu is about to send a ci report.
Jan 9 2025
- Split into different files
- As I am also here mention about multiple staffs in CI and also all of the CI works are mentioned in the CI status report. So refer to them.
- Added a ports file where I have mentioned the work I have done for the ports.
- Added a cluster file where I have mentioned about deploying the Grimoirelab.
- Totally skipped mentioning about CIS as it does not fall in any groups.
In D48392#1103774, @jrm wrote:In D48392#1103769, @bofh wrote:In D48392#1103768, @jrm wrote:This was submitted based on a miscommunication. I'm preparing the Foundation entry, but waiting on some authors to share their contributions. @bofh, could you please close this revision?
I am working on an updated patch as suggested by you. Or do you want me to close the revision and send you the text?
I requested that you submit one or more report entries that are specific to your work like the other Foundation developers. For example:
- https://cgit.freebsd.org/doc/tree/website/content/en/status/report-2024-10-2024-12/suspend.adoc
- https://cgit.freebsd.org/doc/tree/website/content/en/status/report-2024-10-2024-12/wireless-iwx.adoc
- https://cgit.freebsd.org/doc/tree/website/content/en/status/report-2024-10-2024-12/audio.adoc
- https://cgit.freebsd.org/doc/tree/website/content/en/status/report-2024-10-2024-12/foundation-security.adoc
...
If you plan to completely overwrite this review with your content, that also works.
In D48392#1103769, @bofh wrote:In D48392#1103768, @jrm wrote:This was submitted based on a miscommunication. I'm preparing the Foundation entry, but waiting on some authors to share their contributions. @bofh, could you please close this revision?
I am working on an updated patch as suggested by you. Or do you want me to close the revision and send you the text?
In D48392#1103768, @jrm wrote:This was submitted based on a miscommunication. I'm preparing the Foundation entry, but waiting on some authors to share their contributions. @bofh, could you please close this revision?
This was submitted based on a miscommunication. I'm preparing the Foundation entry, but waiting on some authors to share their contributions. @bofh, could you please close this revision?