- Queries
- All Stories
- Search
- Advanced Search
- Transactions
- Transaction Logs
Advanced Search
Wed, Jun 19
Mon, Jun 17
Sun, Jun 16
Thanks for this, could you split the style(9) changes in a other review please ?
Also please re-upload the diff with context (git format-patch -U999 will do the job).
Thu, Jun 13
Tue, Jun 11
Mon, Jun 10
Thu, Jun 6
Wed, Jun 5
Tue, Jun 4
Mon, Jun 3
Thu, May 30
Wed, May 29
Mon, May 27
It doesn't work for some reason but I think that we should simple remove the hardlink, see D45382
Sat, May 25
May 23 2024
May 20 2024
May 17 2024
May 16 2024
In D45205#1031322, @bz wrote:In D45205#1031216, @manu wrote:The main reason for this change is that now struct mtx and spinlock_t are 100% interchangeable in code which is a first step to share structures between linuxkpi driver and native ones.
Can you elaborate on this a bit? Do you have an example? Oh, not the struct mtx you mean but structures embedding struct mtx?
May 15 2024
The main reason for this change is that now struct mtx and spinlock_t are 100% interchangeable in code which is a first step to share structures between linuxkpi driver and native ones.