The big KDE-thing (step0)
AbandonedPublic
Actions

Authored by adridg on Nov 7 2017, 6:42 AM.

Details

Reviewers

rezny
tcberner

Group Reviewers

kde
portmgr
O5: Ports Framework	(Owns No Changed Paths)

Commits

rP461375: Rename KDE4 meta ports

Summary

Move the foo4 metaports to foo-kde4

This should ease D12932

Done:

svn mv
tracking in category/Makefile
Update MOVED
Update dependencies
Update pkgnames

Todo

Bumps

Diff Detail

Repository

rP FreeBSD ports repository

Lint

No Lint Coverage

Unit

No Test Coverage

Build Status

Buildable 12525
Build 12800: arc lint + arc unit

Event Timeline

tcberner created this revision.Nov 7 2017, 6:42 AM

Herald added a subscriber: mat. · View Herald TranscriptNov 7 2017, 6:42 AM

tcberner added a child revision: D12932: The big KDE-thing.Nov 7 2017, 6:43 AM

Harbormaster completed remote builds in B12525: Diff 34869.Nov 7 2017, 3:51 PM

kbowling added a subscriber: kbowling.Nov 7 2017, 6:34 PM

Update pkgnames, and track dependencies and MOVED.

Owners added a reviewer: O5: Ports Framework.Nov 7 2017, 8:30 PM

Herald added a reviewer: portmgr. · View Herald TranscriptNov 7 2017, 8:30 PM

Fix typo in devel/Makefile

Todo: bumps
Maybe, I should also rename other ports that are copied/moved in the big diff... but I think it makes sense to do these separately (kde4-print-manager and so).

tcberner edited the summary of this revision. (Show Details)Nov 8 2017, 6:09 AM

Update against current ports tree to prepare the bumps...

LGTM except for one breaking issue: the file kdegames4/Makefile.common was deleted, instead of moved to kdegames-kde4/, which looks like it breaks all of the individual game ports.

This revision now requires changes to proceed.Dec 30 2017, 1:46 PM

In D12979#286249, @adridg wrote:

LGTM except for one breaking issue: the file kdegames4/Makefile.common was deleted, instead of moved to kdegames-kde4/, which looks like it breaks all of the individual game ports.

Thanks, I will update this once Qt5.9 and Co are through.

Update patch against current ports tree...

I'm not sure what ports should be bumped additionally -- or if bumping the changed ones as it is now is already enough.

portmgr, what do I need to bump after renaming the ports, is it enough to bump the ones that directly depend on one of the renamed ones?

Built for me in poudriere, although this patch is so huge it is very difficult to apply; arc patch doesn't like it either. So accepting, although the question to portmgr still stands.

In D12979#298930, @tcberner wrote:

portmgr, what do I need to bump after renaming the ports, is it enough to bump the ones that directly depend on one of the renamed ones?

Technically, yes, if the resulting package can change, and this includes dependencies, then bumping is needed.

This revision is now accepted and ready to land.Feb 8 2018, 9:25 AM

In D12979#293288, @tcberner wrote:

I'm not sure what ports should be bumped additionally -- or if bumping the changed ones as it is now is already enough.

you do need to bump everything which is linked to the concerned libraries if they have their SOVERSION bumped

Herald added a reviewer: portmgr. · View Herald TranscriptFeb 8 2018, 9:25 AM

This revision now requires review to proceed.Feb 8 2018, 9:25 AM

Herald added a reviewer: portmgr. · View Herald TranscriptFeb 8 2018, 9:25 AM

This revision now requires review to proceed.Feb 8 2018, 9:25 AM

Bumps

Owners added a reviewer: O5: Ports Framework.Feb 8 2018, 9:08 PM