Page MenuHomeFreeBSD

tcp: allow RACK to be loaded when cc_newreno is not compiled into the kernel
ClosedPublic

Authored by tuexen on Sep 25 2022, 11:26 PM.
Tags
None
Referenced Files
Unknown Object (File)
Fri, Nov 29, 5:31 PM
Unknown Object (File)
Fri, Nov 29, 3:34 PM
Unknown Object (File)
Thu, Nov 14, 4:06 AM
Unknown Object (File)
Sun, Nov 10, 11:08 AM
Unknown Object (File)
Oct 25 2024, 5:20 PM
Unknown Object (File)
Oct 24 2024, 3:02 PM
Unknown Object (File)
Sep 25 2024, 9:13 AM
Unknown Object (File)
Sep 25 2024, 6:38 AM

Details

Summary

The RACK stack depends on newreno_beta_ecn. So declare it in cc.c instead of cc_newreno.c. This is relevant since cc_newreno is not the default anymore...

Diff Detail

Repository
rG FreeBSD src repository
Lint
Lint Not Applicable
Unit
Tests Not Applicable

Event Timeline

In accordance with https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc8511.html, should these two sysctls keep the newreno_ moniker? Or renamed to "beta_loss" and "beta_ecn"?

This revision is now accepted and ready to land.Sep 26 2022, 7:49 AM

In accordance with https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc8511.html, should these two sysctls keep the newreno_ moniker? Or renamed to "beta_loss" and "beta_ecn"?

We can (right now) keep the newreno prefix, since it is only needed for newreno, I think. The RACK stack uses it only for cc_newreno.