Page MenuHomeFreeBSD

tcp: allow RACK to be loaded when cc_newreno is not compiled into the kernel
ClosedPublic

Authored by tuexen on Sep 25 2022, 11:26 PM.
Tags
None
Referenced Files
Unknown Object (File)
Apr 20 2025, 9:48 PM
Unknown Object (File)
Mar 29 2025, 11:35 PM
Unknown Object (File)
Mar 5 2025, 7:50 PM
Unknown Object (File)
Mar 5 2025, 6:14 PM
Unknown Object (File)
Mar 5 2025, 4:13 PM
Unknown Object (File)
Feb 16 2025, 1:21 AM
Unknown Object (File)
Feb 13 2025, 8:17 AM
Unknown Object (File)
Feb 12 2025, 11:02 AM

Details

Summary

The RACK stack depends on newreno_beta_ecn. So declare it in cc.c instead of cc_newreno.c. This is relevant since cc_newreno is not the default anymore...

Diff Detail

Repository
rG FreeBSD src repository
Lint
Lint Not Applicable
Unit
Tests Not Applicable

Event Timeline

In accordance with https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc8511.html, should these two sysctls keep the newreno_ moniker? Or renamed to "beta_loss" and "beta_ecn"?

This revision is now accepted and ready to land.Sep 26 2022, 7:49 AM

In accordance with https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc8511.html, should these two sysctls keep the newreno_ moniker? Or renamed to "beta_loss" and "beta_ecn"?

We can (right now) keep the newreno prefix, since it is only needed for newreno, I think. The RACK stack uses it only for cc_newreno.