- Queries
- All Stories
- Search
- Advanced Search
- Transactions
- Transaction Logs
Advanced Search
Dec 12 2018
Nov 25 2018
Nov 17 2018
Nov 10 2018
Nov 6 2018
Oct 31 2018
Oct 28 2018
In D17718#378956, @leres wrote:This seems to always happens with MFH. My new theory is that I need to populate the "Differential Revision" for both the commit (which I did) and with MFH commit (which I did not).
Oct 27 2018
Oct 21 2018
Oct 20 2018
Oct 11 2018
Oct 8 2018
Sep 30 2018
Sep 23 2018
In D17285#368660, @antoine wrote:Is flavoring really needed? number of packages is exploding and now exp-run take several days to complete.
Sep 22 2018
Is this still relevant?
More than two years with no activity.
Sep 21 2018
Sep 20 2018
Sep 15 2018
Sep 12 2018
I can't see any obvious problems, apart from the trivially repeated PORTREVISION thing, but I haven't had a chance to test properly just yet.
Sep 9 2018
Sep 2 2018
Aug 30 2018
Aug 29 2018
Aug 28 2018
Aug 27 2018
Aug 23 2018
Aug 22 2018
Aug 20 2018
In D16716#357694, @koobs wrote:@matthew Syntactical change looks fine, but I'd want to test dependents for compatibility given the major version bump. I'd expect to find some that pinned pbr to < 4
Aug 17 2018
Aug 16 2018
Aug 15 2018
Aug 14 2018
Aug 4 2018
Jul 27 2018
Jul 26 2018
Jul 21 2018
Adding a 'dummy-run' mode -- so it will report on what would be changed without modifying anything on disk -- would be useful.
Bonus points if you run that as a one of the daily periodic jobs.