Page MenuHomeFreeBSD

2019Q3 Quarterly status report
ClosedPublic

Authored by salvadore on Nov 12 2019, 1:19 AM.
Tags
None
Referenced Files
Unknown Object (File)
Dec 21 2023, 10:40 PM
Unknown Object (File)
Dec 20 2023, 3:38 AM
Unknown Object (File)
Dec 13 2023, 2:30 PM
Unknown Object (File)
Nov 10 2023, 10:34 AM
Unknown Object (File)
Nov 10 2023, 9:10 AM
Unknown Object (File)
Nov 9 2023, 8:36 PM
Unknown Object (File)
Nov 8 2023, 9:13 AM
Unknown Object (File)
Nov 6 2023, 11:55 PM
Subscribers

Details

Summary

Draft for the 2019Q3 quarterly status report

Diff Detail

Repository
rD FreeBSD doc repository - subversion
Lint
Lint Skipped
Unit
Tests Skipped

Event Timeline

Added "@" at the end of debdrup nickname.

report-2019-07-2019-09.xml
200

It looks like the markdown parser goofed, or the markdown this was generated from was missing a line break or two.

Obviously 'FreeBSD Release Engineering Team' is meant to be the title of the next section

242

I assume there were snapshots of stable/12

408

We had testing working group at the

411

project

report-2019-07-2019-09.xml
919

Are these meant to each have a * after them, or is that some markdown formatting that did not survive the translation process?

965

Markdown formatting has fallen apart here

This entire report item is mis-formatted all over the place.

1068

A man page for this ...

1162

missing space in minor version

1492

makes it harder

1612

I don't think the underscore needs to be escaped here

1634

PROT_READ did not get the <tt> markup, but kept the `` markdown markup, likely due to the leading (

1933

This item seems to be a duplicate. It exists at line 1422

1995

we don't need to escape _. This likely needs to be checked throughout the entire file

2014

trap_pfault() did not get the <tt> markup

2493

this markdown did not get turned into a link properly

3065

more escaped underscores

3079

escaped asterisk

I'm working on the needed edits: I should be able to have them ready for tomorrow.

report-2019-07-2019-09.xml
242

Indeed it seems so:
https://download.freebsd.org/ftp/snapshots/ISO-IMAGES/12.1/?C=M&O=D

Should I just add <tt>stable/12<tt> or ask releng@ ?

I made all the needed edits, except the one about stable/12 snapshots: I'm unsure what should I do about it.
Should I just add "<tt>stable/12</tt>" to the list? Ask re@? Leave it as it is since 12 was already dealt with in relation to 12.1-RELEASE?

I sent an email to re@ to ask them what to do about the stable/12 snapshots.

salvadore marked an inline comment as done.

Fix last issue about stable/12 snapshots with information got from re@ by email.

Fix many issues:

  • Correct wrong filename in Makefile.
  • Correct wrong lists formatting.
  • Sort links and contacts consistently with precedent quarters.
  • Build table correctly in powerpc report.
  • Other fixes.
This revision is now accepted and ready to land.Nov 25 2019, 7:11 PM
This revision was automatically updated to reflect the committed changes.