Draft for the 2019Q3 quarterly status report
Details
Details
Diff Detail
Diff Detail
- Repository
- rD FreeBSD doc repository - subversion
- Lint
Lint Not Applicable - Unit
Tests Not Applicable
Event Timeline
| report-2019-07-2019-09.xml | ||
|---|---|---|
| 199 ↗ | (On Diff #64237) | It looks like the markdown parser goofed, or the markdown this was generated from was missing a line break or two. Obviously 'FreeBSD Release Engineering Team' is meant to be the title of the next section |
| 241 ↗ | (On Diff #64237) | I assume there were snapshots of stable/12 |
| 407 ↗ | (On Diff #64237) | We had testing working group at the |
| 410 ↗ | (On Diff #64237) | project |
| report-2019-07-2019-09.xml | ||
|---|---|---|
| 918 ↗ | (On Diff #64237) | Are these meant to each have a * after them, or is that some markdown formatting that did not survive the translation process? |
| 964 ↗ | (On Diff #64237) | Markdown formatting has fallen apart here This entire report item is mis-formatted all over the place. |
| 1067 ↗ | (On Diff #64237) | A man page for this ... |
| 1161 ↗ | (On Diff #64237) | missing space in minor version |
| 1491 ↗ | (On Diff #64237) | makes it harder |
| 1611 ↗ | (On Diff #64237) | I don't think the underscore needs to be escaped here |
| 1633 ↗ | (On Diff #64237) | PROT_READ did not get the <tt> markup, but kept the `` markdown markup, likely due to the leading ( |
| 1932 ↗ | (On Diff #64237) | This item seems to be a duplicate. It exists at line 1422 |
| 1994 ↗ | (On Diff #64237) | we don't need to escape _. This likely needs to be checked throughout the entire file |
| 2013 ↗ | (On Diff #64237) | trap_pfault() did not get the <tt> markup |
| 2492 ↗ | (On Diff #64237) | this markdown did not get turned into a link properly |
| 3064 ↗ | (On Diff #64237) | more escaped underscores |
| 3078 ↗ | (On Diff #64237) | escaped asterisk |
Comment Actions
I'm working on the needed edits: I should be able to have them ready for tomorrow.
| report-2019-07-2019-09.xml | ||
|---|---|---|
| 241 ↗ | (On Diff #64237) | Indeed it seems so: Should I just add <tt>stable/12<tt> or ask releng@ ? |
Comment Actions
I made all the needed edits, except the one about stable/12 snapshots: I'm unsure what should I do about it.
Should I just add "<tt>stable/12</tt>" to the list? Ask re@? Leave it as it is since 12 was already dealt with in relation to 12.1-RELEASE?
Comment Actions
Fix many issues:
- Correct wrong filename in Makefile.
- Correct wrong lists formatting.
- Sort links and contacts consistently with precedent quarters.
- Build table correctly in powerpc report.
- Other fixes.