Mailing list: https://lists.cam.ac.uk/pipermail/cl-capsicum-discuss/2016-August/msg00000.html Bugzilla: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201052#add_comment
can you update the comment to describe the new arg
Add comment requested by emaste@.
I agree with the change but would still like to think about the locking some more
Discussed with oshogbo on IRC; we get here when havecaps != NULL and ioctls are encountered.
After r305756 we can do that much simpler ;)
I miss comment which was suggested by @emaste.
Indeed, much more clear after rS305756
Agreed: this change makes perfect sense to me after rS305756.