Mental note

primary ports:
graphics/R-cran-cowplot
devel/R-cran-tidyverse
databases/R-cran-dbplyr

There are 14 ports to add, not 13. Please update review title.

databases/R-cran-dbplyr/        OK
databases/R-cran-dtplyr/        OK
devel/R-cran-conflicted/        MISS (fixed, added to devel/Makefile)
devel/R-cran-gargle/            OK
devel/R-cran-googledrive/       OK
devel/R-cran-googlesheets4/     OK
devel/R-cran-ids/               OK
devel/R-cran-mockr/             OK
devel/R-cran-modelr/            OK
devel/R-cran-systemfonts/       OK
devel/R-cran-tidyverse/         OK
graphics/R-cran-cowplot/        OK
graphics/R-cran-ragg/           OK
print/R-cran-textshaping/       OK

I've started adding ports and it will be single commits like:

commit: add port <cat>/<portname>: ...
(including entry to <cat>/Makefile)

I think this is more correct related to adding new ports to <cat>/Makefile's (it will facilitate a git revert if something is wrong)

Other thing, could we use DISTVERSION instead of PORTVERSION?

In D43735#1017791, @eduardo wrote:

I've started adding ports and it will be single commits like:

commit x:

• add port <cat>/<portname>: ...
• add entry to <cat>/Makefile

I think this is more correct related to adding new ports to <cat>/Makefile's (it will facilitate a git revert if something is wrong)

Sounds good.

Other thing, could we use DISTVERSION instead of PORTVERSION?

Ok, I'll update the revision and switch to DISTVERSION

No need to update review diff. I'll do this.

Fixed missing test depends and now all ports have successfull tests under poudriere jail.
Just finishing testports on 15, 140, 133 and 132 and we are ready to go.

Another issue not discussed here is about choosing WWW R cran packages URL due to it's simplicity instead of using upstream site.
This is a matter of personal taste, so if you decide going that way, please open a PR.
e.g.: https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/xts/index.html