• More cleanup from jbeich@

• security/ipsec-tools: Re-add support for older FreeBSD versions
• Address change requests.

• security/ipsec-tools: Re-add support for older FreeBSD versions

still work-in-progress, fails sanity checks

sync with main, no further changes

In D31072#698977, @tcberner wrote:

In D31072#698971, @bapt wrote:

to be honnest I never like at all NLS, PORTDOCS, PORTEXAMPLES etc macros, if we are to accept glob to ease packaging, I think we should do it at the pkg level aka allow glob in the plist.
That would clean out lots of code from bsd.port.mk while making it really generic.

So now the question is do we want that? (note that this is quite straight forward to do in pkg)

I'm open to having it solved in pkg -- if you can do it. The main disadvantage of doing it there, is that it will take a while for it to be supported everywhere, while in the ports tree it's instantaneous.

How would it be used in for example editors/kate when using your proposed pkg solution? Would everyhting look the same (to the porters), just with an automatically added share/locale/* to the plist instead of the enumeration of all the files?

Hmm, so if adding support to pkg to have share/locale/* (and analogous for e.g. PORTEXAMPLES), it would also make it clear for people who manually look at pkg-plist that the port installs files there (just not which). Once this feature hits pkg (the non-devel version) we can bump the minimum version of pkg to use in the ports tree.

I think the USES=python:2.7,env marked it as deprecated even though only some auxiliary things like devel/py-subversion need Python 2.7 when build for LTS 1.10.x So we could also push down the deprecation?

In D29202#695477, @otis wrote:

Yes, I am working on it..

In D30914#695478, @lev wrote:

I was asked by several people to left subversion-lts as 1.10.x till version AFTER 1.14 will be released (and then updated -lts to 1.14).
I'm not sure, maybe we need to bump -lts to 1.14 now instead of removing it and adding it later. There are some organizations which want to use -lts version, and removal is bad for them.

Any chance of updating textproc/kibana7 to 7.13.2 (which now uses the Elastic license if I understand correctly)? That way ww/node10 (which is EOL upstream and uses EOL Python 2.7) can be removed.

• devel/git: merge two RUN_DEPENDS lines

• ports-mgmt/portshaker: cleanup

• MOVED: fix destination
• update consumers

• MOVED: fix destination

• Add list of ports with dist-mirror in their license.
• Make temporary script executable.
• Allow to pass LEGAL as a parameter to checklicense.sh
• Regenerate dist-mirror.txt after D30010
• checklicense.sh: rework to parse debug-license [1]
• dist-mirror: regenerate after new checklicense.sh and ports rebase.
• Show RESTRICTED_FILES and the "dist" column for each port in LEGAL
• Regenerate dist-mirror.txt
• Tools/scripts/checklicense.sh: anonimize an unused variable.
• math/giacxcas: restrict RESTRICTED_FILES to giac_* only
• dist-mirror.txt: regenerate
• ports-mgmt/portlint: remove the entire former LEGAL block.
• cleanup: remove temporary files used for analysis.