In D12189#255501, @tz wrote:

I'm still confused about all your pear-Updates. At first: it removes the usage of pear. Okay, PEAR was gone and resurrected and many projects went away. Fine.
But:

1. pear is still in the package name even if its not used

In D12169#254551, @rene wrote:

Would it be possible to add NO_ARCH=yes to the port (poudriere suggests it) ?

typo

mv postunexec to preunexec

In D12215#253334, @antoine wrote:

Why postunexec and not preunexec ?

In D12155#253145, @tz wrote:

pkg-static: DEVELOPER_MODE: Notice: arch "FreeBSD:11:i386" -- no architecture specific files found:

• could this package use a wildcard architecture?

NO_ARCH= yes

Please check if a NO_ARCH is appropriate for this port. If yes please add it. If not, not. In both cases: approved.

remove PORTREVISION

In D12146#252278, @mat wrote:

Why remove USES=pear ?

revert PKGNAMEPREFIX

In D11940#250624, @miwi wrote:

Any update?

remove PORTREVISION

set correct NOT_FOR_ARCHS_REASON_sparc64

In D11939#248806, @rene wrote:

Perhaps ask for an MFH, since the new version fixes some security bugs according to the changelog?

In D11940#248810, @rene wrote:

Hmm, does these messages mean that the port does not run on 10.3?

Approved by osa via eMail