if.c: no need for trylock
ClosedPublic
Actions

Authored by bz on May 26 2016, 1:48 PM.

Tags

None

Referenced Files

	F114935354: D6578.id16907.diff
	Fri, Apr 18, 6:19 PM

	Unknown Object (File)
	Wed, Apr 16, 11:54 AM

	Unknown Object (File)
	Tue, Mar 25, 8:02 AM

	Unknown Object (File)
	Feb 2 2025, 11:35 PM

	Unknown Object (File)
	Jan 16 2025, 1:30 AM

	Unknown Object (File)
	Jan 11 2025, 4:45 PM

	Unknown Object (File)
	Jan 11 2025, 7:14 AM

	Unknown Object (File)
	Jan 8 2025, 12:06 PM

View All 69 Files

Subscribers

imp

network

Details

Reviewers

markj
gnn
rwatson

Commits

rS300901: In if_attachdomain1() there does not seem to be any reason

Summary

In if_attachdomain1() there does not seem to be any reason
to use TRYLOCK rather than just acquire the lock.

Diff Detail

Lint

Lint Skipped

Unit

Tests Skipped

Event Timeline

bz updated this revision to Diff 16907.May 26 2016, 1:48 PM

bz retitled this revision from to if.c: no need for trylock.

bz updated this object.

bz edited the test plan for this revision. (Show Details)

bz added reviewers: gnn, markj, rwatson.

bz set the repository for this revision to rS FreeBSD src repository - subversion.

bz added a subscriber: network.

Herald added a subscriber: imp. · View Herald TranscriptMay 26 2016, 1:48 PM

LGTM. I can't see any reason based on the history of the change that introduced this.

This revision is now accepted and ready to land.May 26 2016, 8:28 PM

Closed by commit rS300901: In if_attachdomain1() there does not seem to be any reason (authored by bz). · Explain WhyMay 28 2016, 8:32 AM

This revision was automatically updated to reflect the committed changes.

Revision Contents
Changeset List

Path

Size

sys/

net/

if.c

3 lines

Diff 16907

View Options

if.c: no need for trylockClosedPublicActions