packages: use correct license for clang
ClosedPublic
Actions

Authored by ivy on Aug 6 2025, 5:14 PM.

Details

Reviewers

bapt
imp

Group Reviewers

pkgbase

Commits

rG1bd747746013: package: Use correct license for clang
rG3cbd1f816888: package: Use correct license for clang

Summary

LLVM was relicensed under Apache 2.0 with LLVM exception a while ago.

Diff Detail

Repository

rG FreeBSD src repository

Lint

Lint Not Applicable

Unit

Tests Not Applicable

Event Timeline

ivy created this revision.Aug 6 2025, 5:14 PM

Herald added a subscriber: jrtc27. · View Herald TranscriptAug 6 2025, 5:14 PM

ivy requested review of this revision.Aug 6 2025, 5:14 PM

Harbormaster completed remote builds in B66028: Diff 159884.Aug 6 2025, 5:14 PM

We need support for a WITH clause; LLVM-exception isn't a license itself. It's certainly better than NCSA though.

ziaee added a project: pkgbase.Aug 6 2025, 5:25 PM

with the caveats that ed said.

Maybe 'Apache-2.0 WITH LLVM-Excetion' might be better?

This revision is now accepted and ready to land.Aug 6 2025, 5:42 PM

using X WITH Y as a single license entry makes sense to me, but as i mentioned on IRC it's not really clear if this is how you're meant to use the license field in pkg, so i'll wait to see what bapt says.

bapt accepted this revision.Sep 30 2025, 8:22 AM

Closed by commit rG3cbd1f816888: package: Use correct license for clang (authored by ivy). · Explain WhySep 30 2025, 9:57 AM

This revision was automatically updated to reflect the committed changes.

ivy added a commit: rG3cbd1f816888: package: Use correct license for clang.

ivy added a commit: rG1bd747746013: package: Use correct license for clang.Oct 1 2025, 12:36 PM

Revision Contents
Changeset List

Path

Size

release/

packages/

ucl/

clang-all.ucl

2 lines

Diff 163083

View Options

release/packages/ucl/clang-all.ucl

packages: use correct license for clangClosedPublicActions