Page MenuHomeFreeBSD

rtld(1): Do booleans like C99
ClosedPublic

Authored by cem on Dec 30 2019, 4:07 AM.
Tags
None
Referenced Files
Unknown Object (File)
Wed, Apr 10, 2:29 AM
Unknown Object (File)
Jan 17 2024, 7:32 PM
Unknown Object (File)
Dec 27 2023, 11:38 PM
Unknown Object (File)
Dec 22 2023, 9:52 PM
Unknown Object (File)
Nov 27 2023, 1:31 PM
Unknown Object (File)
Oct 30 2023, 3:12 AM
Unknown Object (File)
Sep 13 2023, 2:15 PM
Unknown Object (File)
Aug 13 2023, 4:12 PM
Subscribers

Diff Detail

Repository
rS FreeBSD src repository - subversion
Lint
Lint Not Applicable
Unit
Tests Not Applicable

Event Timeline

This revision is now accepted and ready to land.Dec 30 2019, 9:00 AM

This one blames to 1998, so I guess it was legit :)

Just curious, what is your aim here? I see a few more of these in the tree. Are you cleaning up specific code of interest or generally trying to C99-ify the tree?

Thanks!

This one blames to 1998, so I guess it was legit :)

Just curious, what is your aim here? I see a few more of these in the tree. Are you cleaning up specific code of interest or generally trying to C99-ify the tree?

In another revision, I added use of bool in an unrelated header that gets included in some rtld CU along with this one, and the two definitions conflict, producing a compilation error. So mostly I'd just like to be able to use C99 bool in other places without breaking rtld.

This revision was automatically updated to reflect the committed changes.