Details
Details
- Reviewers
kib rlibby jhb - Commits
- rS356220: rtld(1): Do booleans like C99
Diff Detail
Diff Detail
- Repository
- rS FreeBSD src repository - subversion
- Lint
Lint Not Applicable - Unit
Tests Not Applicable
Event Timeline
Comment Actions
This one blames to 1998, so I guess it was legit :)
Just curious, what is your aim here? I see a few more of these in the tree. Are you cleaning up specific code of interest or generally trying to C99-ify the tree?
Comment Actions
Thanks!
In another revision, I added use of bool in an unrelated header that gets included in some rtld CU along with this one, and the two definitions conflict, producing a compilation error. So mostly I'd just like to be able to use C99 bool in other places without breaking rtld.