What is the rationale behind this change, please? Moreover, I guess @jrm is the best samba person in this ballroom.

OBE

After proof-reading multiple times, LGTM, too.

It would be nice to have the rules syntax described in grammar-tyle, similarly to pf.conf(5).

It seems to me that there is another problem, or that I'm missing something obvious:

In D48129#1097601, @olce wrote:

Could you please move the printing (see inline comment)? It is still misplaced.

• Print also process full path
• Tweak manpage a bit

Make -B and -C options descriptions more sensible.

Overcome by events.

In D47520#1086334, @markj wrote:

The behavior can be observed by tracing the route to 2a02:ee80:4028:1126::

IMO it would be nicer to describe this behaviour in the commit log message. What exactly happens?

Correctly update the manpage date.

Ship it.

Set _localbase earlier from within /etc/defaults/periodic.conf

LGTM if @driesm agrees.

Really update the manpage

• Do not print !R
• Unify ICMPv6 to ICMP6 in manpage

Update manpage date

Print !R on route rejected error and update manual page.

disregard. PEBKAC.

In D46748#1065822, @kevans wrote:

Can you explain more on why you think you want this? The entire point was to hide the interface and avoid it becoming part of the ABI we need to care about.

When I think of it more closely, couldn't it be modified to do something like --no-supervise or --execute-only and use -p to get the command's pid file in child-pidfile? I'm just trying to avoid duplicate functionality.

@brnrd what about you?

Add tests.