I feel like this change also needs to incorporate https://reviews.freebsd.org/D30176 somehow - maybe check the platform first, then remove the tests that depend on absolute paths?

A thought: could we also mention that we need to install some dependencies and they may have different package names?

IMO we could indeed recommend textproc/docproj. If we are going with this minimal approach, maybe try all checks and pop up the recommendations all at once, to avoid people having to run it multiple times to satisfy all dependencies? (and we can even recommend both)

In D30145#676725, @fel1x.mintchoco.development_gmail.com wrote:

change2.diff65 KBDownload

Thank you for your advice. Here is a new full diff file. I corrected :s and deleteed things that are not ready yet(VMware Workstation, Hyper-V).

Hi! Before diving into the review, two quick suggestions:

• It is usually better to submit patches that are generated by diff -U999999 to give better contexts to reviewers.
• Populating the "Test Plan" section of the reviews is recommended (e.g. doc builds fine, images displayed correctly, etc).

Looks good to me!

In D29717#667346, @dbaio wrote:

what about adding this note and wait for 3 or 6 months? If we don't have any progress we can remove that. And I can add this reminder for myself.

Also closing the related PR. https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=252116

I don't believe so - I thought we are waiting for @timur since I am not a ports committer, but in this case, I can commit it with his approval on this review.

Committed as:

LGTM, just threw it into Poudriere and waiting for @lwhsu 's approval.

LGTM on the doc side, thanks!

Just a quick note that the submitter is not a committer, so someone needs to commit this one ;)

Closed by https://reviews.freebsd.org/D27774.

Needs rebase to the new doc infra.

LGTM on the doc side, please update .Dd when committing, thanks ;)