Tom, I see no problem with getting this in before the release, as the documentation distribution set is no longer included on the installer.

In D32450#731791, @emaste wrote:

@gjb what do you think about the suggestion above?

FreeBSD releases are classified into the _Newest Release Series_ and _Older Release Series_. The newest release is best suited to users looking for the latest new features. Older releases are for users with a more conservative upgrade strategy wishing to stay on an existing release series.

In D32450#731774, @gjb wrote:

In D32450#731740, @emaste wrote:

The intent, as I understand it, is that the most recent major will be called the production release and the previous major(s) will be called legacy releases.

I do not like this suggestion.

I thought we were done with the "production" versus "legacy" release categorization when the support model that was implemented in 11.0 went into place and 10.x reached EoL.

With that said, 12.3 is on the horizon, which will be "newer" than 13.0. How can we consider that to be a "legacy" release?

I object to this proposed change.

In D32450#731740, @emaste wrote:

The intent, as I understand it, is that the most recent major will be called the production release and the previous major(s) will be called legacy releases.

In D31134#718456, @decke wrote:

Can we please continue the discussion if it is feasible to add more images/boards to the release scripts?