pkgconfig is the defacto standard to find components. Instead of
opting-in to depending on pkgconfig via USES=pkgconfig, this switches
the behaviour to be opt-out.
If a port does not want pkgconfig, it now needs to define
WITHOUT_PKGCONFIG=yes
| Unknown Object (File) | |
| Thu, Oct 1, 7:12 AM |
| Unknown Object (File) | |
| Tue, Sep 22, 8:04 PM |
| Unknown Object (File) | |
| Tue, Sep 22, 8:04 PM |
| Unknown Object (File) | |
| Tue, Sep 22, 7:58 PM |
| Unknown Object (File) | |
| Fri, Sep 11, 3:10 PM |
| Unknown Object (File) | |
| Thu, Sep 10, 10:23 PM |
| Unknown Object (File) | |
| Tue, Sep 8, 11:40 AM |
| Unknown Object (File) | |
| Sep 8 2026, 5:01 AM |
pkgconfig is the defacto standard to find components. Instead of
opting-in to depending on pkgconfig via USES=pkgconfig, this switches
the behaviour to be opt-out.
If a port does not want pkgconfig, it now needs to define
WITHOUT_PKGCONFIG=yes
| No Lint Coverage |
| No Test Coverage |
| Buildable 47267 | |
| Build 44154: arc lint + arc unit |
| Mk/Features/pkgconfig.mk | ||
|---|---|---|
| 10 | ^ check probably should be on !empty()? | |
| Mk/Uses/qt-dist.mk | ||
|---|---|---|
| 156 | Why was qmake excluded, for efficiency? | |
| Mk/Uses/qt-dist.mk | ||
|---|---|---|
| 156 | I think that information is lot to time :) -- I have no clue why it was done that way (if there was a good reason, the exp-run should hopefully show it). | |
As discussed with @bapt, I'll try to look into an other way to make pc-support better.