[NEW PORT] devel/riscv64-binutils dvel/riscv64-gcc

[bapt]

Why 6.1 and not 6.3 for gcc why not making it a slave port of the other *-gcc ports?

[lwhsu]

In D9020#186322, @bapt wrote:

Why 6.1 and not 6.3 for gcc why not making it a slave port of the other *-gcc ports?

This is from https://github.com/freebsd-riscv/riscv-gcc and I am not sure official gcc 6.3 has full risc-v support now.

[lwhsu]

I have tested this with https://gist.github.com/lwhsu/a266d52bc37523925bca5131523f7806 and build a BBL with the instructions in "Build bbl" on https://wiki.freebsd.org/riscv (without PREFIX setting), then boot in emulators/qemu-riscv:

qemu-system-riscv64 -nographic -m 2048M -kernel /path/to/bbl

I guess this is OK to add these two ports? Or does anybody think that they should be renamed to "devel/riscv64-binutils" and "dvel/riscv64-gcc"?

[lwhsu]

rename to riscv64-

[lwhsu]

If no one objects, I'm going to add these ports tomorrow (i.e. after 12 hours)

[sbruno]