uname.1: Document which flags are non-POSIX
Needs ReviewPublic
Actions

Authored by temcbun_gmail.com on Jul 27 2026, 10:57 AM.

Tags

Referenced Files

	F175217035: D58476.id182776.diff
	Fri, Oct 9, 4:35 AM

	Unknown Object (File)
	Tue, Oct 6, 3:29 PM

	Unknown Object (File)
	Tue, Oct 6, 6:46 AM

	Unknown Object (File)
	Mon, Oct 5, 10:25 PM

	Unknown Object (File)
	Mon, Oct 5, 9:04 AM

	Unknown Object (File)
	Sat, Oct 3, 8:55 PM

	Unknown Object (File)
	Thu, Oct 1, 5:04 AM

	Unknown Object (File)
	Thu, Oct 1, 3:04 AM

View All 59 Files

Subscribers

imp

Details

Reviewers

ziaee
emaste
gbe
des

Group Reviewers

docs
manpages
Contributor Reviews (src)

Diff Detail

Repository

rG FreeBSD src repository

Lint

Lint Skipped

Unit

Tests Skipped

Event Timeline

temcbun_gmail.com created this revision.Jul 27 2026, 10:57 AM

Herald added a subscriber: imp. · View Herald TranscriptJul 27 2026, 10:57 AM

temcbun_gmail.com requested review of this revision.Jul 27 2026, 10:57 AM

So we've been trying to standardize this language, here's the draft: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D57690

usr.bin/uname/uname.1
154	I don't think the Op is appropriate here?

Use standardized formulation.

In D58476#1342416, @ziaee wrote:

So we've been trying to standardize this language, here's the draft: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D57690

Oops, sorry, my bad! Completely forgot about that... :)

temcbun_gmail.com marked an inline comment as done.Jul 28 2026, 8:58 AM

Ping.

Revision Contents
Changeset List

Path

Size

usr.bin/

uname/

uname.1

12 lines

Diff 182922

View Options

uname.1: Document which flags are non-POSIXNeeds ReviewPublicActions