lang/rust-nightly: Update to 1.9.0.20160318

[dumbbell]

Summary

Beside the update from upstream, this should help us prepare a new stage0 bootstrap for later versions.

While here, I imported many changes made to lang/rust.

[dumbbell]

Fix pkg-plist

[jbeich]

Looks fine but pkg-plist is still wrong, it misses new files. Maybe also copy TEST_TARGET piece from lang/rust.

===> Checking for items in STAGEDIR missing from pkg-plist
Error: Orphaned: lib/librustc_const_eval-%%RUST_VSN_HASH%%.so
Error: Orphaned: lib/librustc_metadata-%%RUST_VSN_HASH%%.so
Error: Orphaned: lib/librustc_passes-%%RUST_VSN_HASH%%.so
Error: Orphaned: lib/librustc_plugin-%%RUST_VSN_HASH%%.so
Error: Orphaned: lib/libsyntax_ext-%%RUST_VSN_HASH%%.so
Error: Orphaned: lib/rustlib/manifest-rust-std-%%RUST_TARGET%%
Error: Orphaned: lib/rustlib/%%RUST_TARGET%%/lib/librustc_const_eval-%%RUST_VSN_HASH%%.rlib
Error: Orphaned: lib/rustlib/%%RUST_TARGET%%/lib/librustc_const_eval-%%RUST_VSN_HASH%%.so
Error: Orphaned: lib/rustlib/%%RUST_TARGET%%/lib/librustc_metadata-%%RUST_VSN_HASH%%.so
Error: Orphaned: lib/rustlib/%%RUST_TARGET%%/lib/librustc_passes-%%RUST_VSN_HASH%%.so
Error: Orphaned: lib/rustlib/%%RUST_TARGET%%/lib/librustc_plugin-%%RUST_VSN_HASH%%.so
Error: Orphaned: lib/rustlib/%%RUST_TARGET%%/lib/libsyntax_ext-%%RUST_VSN_HASH%%.so

lang/rust-nightly/Makefile

173 ↗

(On Diff #14675)

Is this new in -nightly or affects lang/rust as well?

175 ↗

(On Diff #14675)

Convert to post-install-DOCS-on:. See 5.12.3.13 in Porter's Handbook or 20150701 entry in /usr/ports/CHANGES for details.

[dumbbell]

Address @jbeich comments

• Fix pkg-plist (orphaned files)
• Include D5770
• Use post-install-DOCS-on for DOCS-specific commands

For the latter, I had to add DOCS to the OPTIONS.

[dumbbell]

lang/rust-nightly/Makefile

173 ↗

(On Diff #14675)

It looks like new, though I didn't try to build lang/rust lately.

[asomers]

lang/rust-nightly/Makefile

76 ↗

(On Diff #14681)

The build will fail if llvm was not built with the Lit option. Does Ports have anyway to specify which options dependencies must be built with?

configure: error: program '/usr/local/llvm36/bin/FileCheck' is missing, please install it

[jbeich]

lang/rust-nightly/Makefile

76 ↗

(On Diff #14681)

Does Ports have anyway to specify which options dependencies must be built with?

Not yet. It's long desired feature[1]. There's a recent attempt to implement it via pkg(8) support for flavors and subpackages. But before that happens ports have to work around by depending on a specific file, testing features via pre-configure, making the options default or creating slaves (heavy build unlike subpackages).

[1] https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/2005-April/022878.html

lang/rust-nightly/Makefile:76 The build will fail if llvm was not built with the Lit option.

LIT option is enabled by default in devel/llvm* ports. Also, lang/rust-nightly builds fine against either llvm36 or llvm38 but not llvm37 yet because of bug 208248.

configure: error: program '/usr/local/llvm36/bin/FileCheck' is missing, please install it

Which version are you testing? Both rP411819 and D5770 have

PORT_LLVM_BUILD_DEPENDS=	${LLVM_PREFIX}/bin/FileCheck:${PORTSDIR}/devel/llvm${LLVM_VER}

which aborts build until llvm version with FileCheck utility is installed.

[asomers]

lang/rust-nightly/Makefile

76 ↗

(On Diff #14681)

I'm testing 10.2-RELEASE with your patch. The build doesn't actually abort if FileCheck isn't installed; it just tries to rebuild llvm but doesn't check afterwards that FileCheck was actually installed. I had earlier disabled LIT for llvm to eliminate the Python dependency. It doesn't sound like there's much we can do about this problem ATM.

[jbeich]

lang/rust-nightly/Makefile

92 ↗

(On Diff #14704)

Other ways to fix ${ARCH} poisoning from bsd.port.mk:

• devel/llvm36: files/patch-utils_llvm-build_llvmbuild_main.py (also used by lang/rust)
• devel/llvm38: CONFIGURE_TARGET:=${ARCH:C/amd64/x86_64/:C/armv6hf/armv6/}-portbld-${OPSYS:tl}${OSREL}

https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/2015-December/101284.html

76 ↗

(On Diff #14681)

Aborting before build recurses would be more ugly:

pre-configure:
# .if !exists() evaluates too early before the dependency has a chance to be installed
	@if ! hash FileCheck 2>/dev/null; then \
		${ECHO_MSG} "${PKGNAME}: Rebuild devel/llvm${LLVM_VER} with LIT option enabled."; \
		exit 1; \
	fi