This change moves support for Synopsys Designware APB UART out of ns8250 into a separate driver, and adds support for activating clock and hwreset resources when the EXT_RESOURCES option is present.
Details
- Reviewers
andrew adrian - Group Reviewers
ARM - Commits
- rS297496: Move support for Synopsys Designware APB UART out of ns8250 and into a
Diff Detail
- Repository
- rS FreeBSD src repository - subversion
- Lint
Lint Skipped - Unit
Tests Skipped
Event Timeline
sys/arm/conf/A20 | ||
---|---|---|
75 | Shouldn't the dependancy on ns8250 be handled in sys/conf/files ? I'm really not sure if this kind of stuff is ok. |
sys/arm/conf/A20 | ||
---|---|---|
75 | When you have two options that need to be set it would be: ... optional uart uart_foo | uart uart_bar |
- Make uart_snps depend on uart_ns8250
- Remove redundant clk_disable calls before clk_release
sys/dev/uart/uart_dev_ns8250.c | ||
---|---|---|
460 | This doesn't seems to be needed anymore, the busy-detect property was when ns8250 wasn't snps aware. |
sys/dev/uart/uart_dev_snps.c | ||
---|---|---|
158 | Two problems --
|
- uart_dev_ns8250: Remove support for "busy-detect" property.
- uart_dev_snps: allow to attach to ofwbus as well as simplebus to match uart_bus_fdt behavior.
sys/dev/uart/uart_dev_snps.c | ||
---|---|---|
285 | This is not needed. Owfbus is subclass of simplebus for some time, so binding to simplebus also matches to ofwbus. |
sys/dev/uart/uart_dev_snps.c | ||
---|---|---|
285 | Have you tested this? I've found both are needed if the device could be a child of either. |
sys/dev/uart/uart_dev_snps.c | ||
---|---|---|
285 | Yes, sure. Tegra, for example, doesn't not have 'base' SoC simplebus at all, all devices are children of ofwbus. Binding to base class also matches to all its subclasses. |