Mk/: Possible values for "ssl" are inconsistent

[michaelo]

Summary

PR: 279430
Approved by: jrm (mentor), otis (mentor), brnrd

[otis]

LGTM.

@brnrd what about you?

[jrm]

Should add portmgr as a reviewer? There may be a server-side git hook to ensure commits under Mk/ are approved by them.

[michaelo]

In D46059#1052323, @jrm wrote:

Should add portmgr as a reviewer? There may be a server-side git hook to ensure commits under Mk/ are approved by them.

Why not, please do.

[mat]

We probably need a message on each list asking to keep it in sync with the two other.

[michaelo]

Anyone else, any objections?

[mat]

In D46059#1053621, @michaelo wrote:

Anyone else, any objections?

As I said, we need a message at each location saying "update the two other locations", please add it.

[mat]

Something like this

Mk/Scripts/qa.sh

625–630

Mk/Uses/ssl.mk

11–15

Mk/bsd.default-versions.mk

149–151

[michaelo]

In D46059#1053623, @mat wrote:

Something like this

I see what you are after now, thanks.

[michaelo]

Add mat's comments

[michaelo]

Issues addressed.