Actually use INT_MAX (0x7fffffff), not UINT_MAX (0xffffffff) to avoid overflowing and missing the test. Reported by: Jenkins
Details
Details
- Reviewers
markj asomers - Group Reviewers
network - Commits
- rGf790f2809202: ping tests: Fix test on i386 platforms
rG24fe0cb84d71: ping tests: Fix test on i386 platforms
The idea is to hit the test, not to overflow 32-bit architecture's time_t.
I do not have a 32-bit VM at the moment, would it be possible to run the test on ci.freebsd.org, and verify that test:
https://ci.freebsd.org/view/Test/job/FreeBSD-main-i386-test/17993/testReport/junit/sbin.ping.test_ping/py/TestPing__test_pinger__0_0_special_warp_/
Passes on i386?:
/usr/tests# kyua debug sbin/ping/test_ping.py:TestPing::test_pinger[_0_0_special_warp]
Diff Detail
Diff Detail
- Repository
- rG FreeBSD src repository
- Lint
Lint Skipped - Unit
Tests Skipped
Event Timeline
Comment Actions
I do not have a 32-bit VM at the moment, would it be possible to run the test on ci.freebsd.org, and verify that test:
Unfortunately there's no easy way to manually test patches using ci.freebsd.org yet. In the meantime I downloaded an i386 VM image and verified that the test passes.