sysutils/cpu-microcode-*: Reorganize CPU microcode ports

[jrm]

Summary

Prior to this update, sysutils/devcpu-data, which only contains an RC
script, had run dependencies on the AMD and Intel microcode ports. This
made it cumbersome to have just the AMD or just the Intel microcode
ports installed. With this change, the microcode ports now depend on
the RC script.

Other changes:

• Use more intuitive port names: cpu-microcode, cpu-microcode-amd, cpu-microcode-intel, and cpu-microcode-rc.
• Add the metaport, cpu-microcode, which pulls in all related ports.
• Pet portclippy/portfmt

[markj]

I like the change overall. My one annoying/bikesheddy comment is, can we call them cpu-microcode-* instead of cpu-ucode-*? I don't think the terseness buys us anything, "microcode" is more amenable to searching (e.g., with pkg search), and the rc.d script is called microcode_update.

[jrm]

In D41406#942846, @markj wrote:

I like the change overall. My one annoying/bikesheddy comment is, can we call them cpu-microcode-* instead of cpu-ucode-*? I don't think the terseness buys us anything, "microcode" is more amenable to searching (e.g., with pkg search), and the rc.d script is called microcode_update.

Not bikesheddy to me. I think it's a good point and will make that change later today. Thanks.

[jrm]

Change new port names from cpu-ucode-* to cpu-microcode-*.

[lwhsu]

Thanks very much for implementing this idea!

A minor point: since we have port/package names changed, do you think we can also change the PORTVERSION of cpu-microcode and cpu-microcode-rc to something like 1.0 as they don't need to reflect the snapshot date.

[lwhsu]

sysutils/cpu-microcode-rc/distinfo contains TIMESTAMP only, I think it can be removed.

[markj]

Thank you!

sysutils/cpu-microcode-rc/files/pkg-message.in

22–23

I think there should be a comma after "here".

sysutils/cpu-microcode/pkg-descr

2

[jrm]

Incorporate suggestions from lwhsu and markj

• tweak cpu-microcode/pkg-descr
• add missing comma for nonrestrictive clause in devcpu-data/files/pkg-message.in
• remove unnecessary sysutils/cpu-microcode-rc/distinfo

The only suggestion I didn't incorporate was changing PORTVERSION of
cpu-microcode and cpu-microcode-rc from a datestamp to 1.0. Help me understand
why PORTVERSION=1.0 is better than a datestamp and I'll make the change.

[lwhsu]

In D41406#943556, @jrm wrote:

The only suggestion I didn't incorporate was changing PORTVERSION of
cpu-microcode and cpu-microcode-rc from a datestamp to 1.0. Help me understand
why PORTVERSION=1.0 is better than a datestamp and I'll make the change.

I don't have strong opinion about this. My preference is because that these two ports contain the things we developed locally and don't like in other two ports, it represents the snapshot date. Thus we can use semantic versioning (https://semver.org/). And in the past, people didn't aware it and just bump all the date-style PORTVERSION

[jrm]

Switch value of PORTVERSION in sysutils/cpu-microcode and sysutils/cpu-microcode-rc from datastamps to semantic versions

[lwhsu]

Thanks!

[sbruno]

Nice work. This looks good to me. Thank you for implementing this.