Page MenuHomeFreeBSD

Update secteam listing and add ports-secteam to administration page
AbandonedPublic

Authored by matthew on Jun 11 2015, 12:15 AM.
Tags
None
Referenced Files
Unknown Object (File)
Apr 11 2024, 2:47 PM
Unknown Object (File)
Apr 5 2024, 4:22 AM
Unknown Object (File)
Jan 22 2024, 11:29 AM
Unknown Object (File)
Jan 16 2024, 3:39 AM
Unknown Object (File)
Jan 13 2024, 9:54 AM
Unknown Object (File)
Dec 22 2023, 9:44 PM
Unknown Object (File)
Nov 25 2023, 5:57 AM
Unknown Object (File)
Nov 22 2023, 8:15 AM

Details

Summary

Update the administration page to

  • record the handover of the Security Officer role to Xin Li
  • add a list of the members of ports-secteam to the page

Diff Detail

Repository
rD FreeBSD doc repository - subversion
Lint
No Lint Coverage
Unit
No Test Coverage

Event Timeline

matthew retitled this revision from to Update secteam listing and add ports-secteam to administration page.
matthew updated this object.
matthew edited the test plan for this revision. (Show Details)
matthew added a reviewer: delphij.

type: Portssecurity --> Ports security

This is a duplicate of D2761

administration.xml
270

Is there a charter for the Ports Secteam anywhere? All I can find is https://wiki.freebsd.org/Drafts/ports-secteam

administration.xml
252

John-Mark have become a member of secteam@ but I don't know if I can revise this changeset. Could you please also add him while you are there?

270

The discussion was stalled and we would need to pick that up, possibly have core@ ratify that and publish it in the FreeBSD security page.

Actually, instead of abandoning this review, increase the scope of it. In addition to
updating the secteam roster and adding in ports-secteam

  • Generally synch the lists of the membership of each team against the information available in the aliases file on hub, plus some mailman distribution lists. Be consistent in not including various 'lurkers' groups.
  • accounts, backups, dnsadm are aliased to clusteradm at the moment
  • add in the teams responsible for the forums, phabricator, jenkins and exporting code to GitHub.
administration.xml
252

Done. imp also tagged as 'Officer Emeritus'

270

I'll add Core Team to the reviewers, once I figure out how...

administration.xml
252

Technically, Robert is also Officer Emeritus (he is on security-officer@ alias). Maybe he should be added as well?

337

Edward have stepped down some time ago and Remko have offered to take the responsibility.

350–351

I think "Cluster Administration" should have a link to #t-clusteradm.

eadler requested changes to this revision.Jun 12 2015, 11:13 PM
eadler added a reviewer: eadler.
eadler added subscribers: simon, eadler.
eadler added inline comments.
administration.xml
252

if he is still on security-officer@ he should be added.

266–267

part of the scope includes security of the packaging tools and infrastructure.

270

I've written a proposed charter but it was never really picked up. I believe @simon also wrote one.

357–361

If its the same team, it shouldn't be listed separately.

428–462

ditto here. if dnsadm == clusteradm, it should be removed.

496–498

phabricator is more than just code review, but this is likely correct for now.

This revision now requires changes to proceed.Jun 12 2015, 11:13 PM
matthew added inline comments.
administration.xml
337

OK -- then the secteam-secretary mail alias should be updated

357–361

The precedent is still to list the address -- see https://www.freebsd.org/administration.html#t-vendor

I'd like to get peter to comment -- as I understand it, he wants to maintain the distinction between the different addresses: sending everything through to clusteradm is officially a temporary change.

matthew edited edge metadata.
matthew marked an inline comment as done.

secteam-secretary is actually remko, even though the alias forwards to trasz

Update the description of ports-secteam

matthew edited edge metadata.

Add internal links to #t-clusteradm and #t-doceng where those aliases
are referenced from other addresses.

eadler removed a reviewer: eadler.

Thanks for making those changes! I'm withdrawing my 'changes needed'.

whatever happened to this diff? Should I comandeer it?

In D2774#56751, @eadler wrote:

whatever happened to this diff? Should I comandeer it?

secteam@/so@/ports-secteam@ is still under discussion, maybe we can integrate the rest part of the change first?

matthew edited edge metadata.

Merge upstream changes

Reduce diff against upstream.

This now only contains the ports-secteam@ related changes.

eadler edited edge metadata.
This revision is now accepted and ready to land.Jul 6 2015, 1:09 AM
mat added inline comments.
administration.xml
462

Please don't mix content and white-space changes.

475

Please don't mix content and white-space changes.

feld requested changes to this revision.Sep 5 2015, 1:06 AM
feld added a reviewer: feld.
feld added a subscriber: feld.
feld added inline comments.
administration.xml
275

des is not on ports-secteam at least according to email alias and organization.dot

276–277

feld needs to be added here

This revision now requires changes to proceed.Sep 5 2015, 1:06 AM

This is way out of date