Page MenuHomeFreeBSD

Mark more nodes as CTLFLAG_MPSAFE or CTLFLAG_NEEDGIANT (M of N)
ClosedPublic

Authored by kaktus on Feb 11 2020, 9:12 PM.
Tags
None
Referenced Files
Unknown Object (File)
Thu, Oct 2, 6:31 PM
Unknown Object (File)
Sat, Sep 27, 3:23 AM
Unknown Object (File)
Fri, Sep 26, 8:29 PM
Unknown Object (File)
Mon, Sep 22, 12:57 AM
Unknown Object (File)
Thu, Sep 18, 2:54 AM
Unknown Object (File)
Wed, Sep 17, 4:06 AM
Unknown Object (File)
Sep 6 2025, 4:01 PM
Unknown Object (File)
Aug 27 2025, 2:04 PM
Subscribers

Details

Summary

r357614 added CTLFLAG_NEEDGIANT to make it easier to find nodes that are still not MPSAFE (or already are but aren’t properly marked). Use it in preparation for a general review of all nodes.
This is non-functional change that adds annotations to SYSCTL_NODE and SYSCTL_PROC nodes using one of the soon-to-be-required flags.

You’re asked for a review based on src/MAINTAINERS entry.

Diff Detail

Repository
rS FreeBSD src repository - subversion
Lint
Lint Not Applicable
Unit
Tests Not Applicable

Event Timeline

sys/arm/allwinner/aw_sid.c
281 ↗(On Diff #68147)

MPSAFE?

sys/arm/allwinner/aw_thermal.c
679 ↗(On Diff #68147)

MPSAFE?

sys/arm/allwinner/aw_ts.c
208 ↗(On Diff #68147)

MPSAFE?

sys/arm/allwinner/axp209.c
1271 ↗(On Diff #68147)

MPSAFE?

sys/arm/allwinner/axp81x.c
1541 ↗(On Diff #68147)

MPSAFE?

1549 ↗(On Diff #68147)

Require some locking to protect against concurrent modifications?

sys/arm/allwinner/if_emac.c
927 ↗(On Diff #68147)

Require some locking to protect against concurrent modifications?

sys/arm64/rockchip/rk_tsadc.c
569 ↗(On Diff #68147)

MPSAFE?

This revision was not accepted when it landed; it landed in state Needs Review.Feb 24 2020, 10:45 AM
This revision was automatically updated to reflect the committed changes.