Page MenuHomeFreeBSD

Mark more nodes as CTLFLAG_MPSAFE or CTLFLAG_NEEDGIANT (M of N)
ClosedPublic

Authored by kaktus on Feb 11 2020, 9:12 PM.
Tags
None
Referenced Files
Unknown Object (File)
Tue, Nov 25, 4:02 PM
Unknown Object (File)
Tue, Nov 25, 8:47 AM
Unknown Object (File)
Thu, Nov 20, 1:26 PM
Unknown Object (File)
Thu, Nov 20, 1:24 PM
Unknown Object (File)
Thu, Nov 20, 1:24 PM
Unknown Object (File)
Thu, Nov 20, 1:04 PM
Unknown Object (File)
Thu, Nov 6, 3:07 AM
Unknown Object (File)
Oct 28 2025, 4:05 PM
Subscribers

Details

Summary

r357614 added CTLFLAG_NEEDGIANT to make it easier to find nodes that are still not MPSAFE (or already are but aren’t properly marked). Use it in preparation for a general review of all nodes.
This is non-functional change that adds annotations to SYSCTL_NODE and SYSCTL_PROC nodes using one of the soon-to-be-required flags.

You’re asked for a review based on src/MAINTAINERS entry.

Diff Detail

Repository
rS FreeBSD src repository - subversion
Lint
Lint Not Applicable
Unit
Tests Not Applicable

Event Timeline

sys/arm/allwinner/aw_sid.c
281 ↗(On Diff #68147)

MPSAFE?

sys/arm/allwinner/aw_thermal.c
679 ↗(On Diff #68147)

MPSAFE?

sys/arm/allwinner/aw_ts.c
208 ↗(On Diff #68147)

MPSAFE?

sys/arm/allwinner/axp209.c
1271 ↗(On Diff #68147)

MPSAFE?

sys/arm/allwinner/axp81x.c
1541 ↗(On Diff #68147)

MPSAFE?

1549 ↗(On Diff #68147)

Require some locking to protect against concurrent modifications?

sys/arm/allwinner/if_emac.c
927 ↗(On Diff #68147)

Require some locking to protect against concurrent modifications?

sys/arm64/rockchip/rk_tsadc.c
569 ↗(On Diff #68147)

MPSAFE?

This revision was not accepted when it landed; it landed in state Needs Review.Feb 24 2020, 10:45 AM
This revision was automatically updated to reflect the committed changes.