Differential D20795

Control implicit PROT_MAX() using proccontrol(1) and the FreeBSD note feature bit.
ClosedPublic
Actions

Authored by kib on Jun 28 2019, 6:16 PM.

Tags

None

Referenced Files

	F118730896: D20795.diff
	Sun, Jun 1, 7:53 AM

	Unknown Object (File)
	Fri, May 30, 10:59 PM

	Unknown Object (File)
	Wed, May 28, 3:19 PM

	Unknown Object (File)
	Tue, May 27, 5:48 AM

	Unknown Object (File)
	May 1 2025, 2:18 AM

	Unknown Object (File)
	Apr 18 2025, 8:24 PM

	Unknown Object (File)
	Apr 17 2025, 11:03 PM

	Unknown Object (File)
	Apr 15 2025, 6:38 PM

View All 65 Files

Subscribers

Details

Reviewers

emaste
brooks
markj

Group Reviewers

Commits

rS349610: Add implicit PROT_MAX() knob to proccontrol(1).
rS349609: Control implicit PROT_MAX() using procctl(2) and the FreeBSD note
rS349608: Use traditional 'p' local to designate td->td_proc in kern_mmap.

Diff Detail

Repository

rS FreeBSD src repository - subversion

Lint

Lint Not Applicable

Unit

Tests Not Applicable

Event Timeline

kib created this revision.Jun 28 2019, 6:16 PM

Herald added a reviewer: manpages. · View Herald TranscriptJun 28 2019, 6:16 PM

Herald added a subscriber: imp. · View Herald Transcript

Harbormaster completed remote builds in B25109: Diff 59163.Jun 28 2019, 6:16 PM

Overall looks reasonable, a few small alpha ordering nits.

sys/compat/freebsd32/freebsd32_misc.c
3337 ↗	(On Diff #59163)	alpha order
sys/vm/vm_mmap.c
59 ↗	(On Diff #59163)	can this go in alpha order, other misordered headers notwithstanding?
usr.bin/proccontrol/proccontrol.c
76 ↗	(On Diff #59163)	alpha order

Suggested rewording of a sentence.

lib/libc/sys/procctl.2
129 ↗	(On Diff #59163)	The image flag might still prevent the enablement.

kib marked 4 inline comments as done.Jun 28 2019, 7:31 PM

kib added inline comments.

sys/vm/vm_mmap.c
59 ↗	(On Diff #59163)	Not sure what would be the right place then. Moved before filedesc.h.

markj added inline comments.Jun 30 2019, 6:08 PM

lib/libc/sys/procctl.2
119 ↗	(On Diff #59163)	and .Xr mprotect 2
128 ↗	(On Diff #59163)	It would be nice to reference the sysctl here, "disabled system-wide by vm.imply_prot_max"
131 ↗	(On Diff #59163)	Should be "be disabled."
133 ↗	(On Diff #59163)	Extra _ between PROT and MAX.
136 ↗	(On Diff #59163)	"Use the system-wide ..."

Man page update and minor code rearrangement.

Harbormaster completed remote builds in B25134: Diff 59221.Jun 30 2019, 7:06 PM

markj accepted this revision.Jul 2 2019, 3:00 PM

This revision is now accepted and ready to land.Jul 2 2019, 3:00 PM

emaste accepted this revision.Jul 2 2019, 3:08 PM

brooks added inline comments.Jul 2 2019, 4:23 PM

lib/libc/sys/procctl.2
119 ↗	(On Diff #59163)	We don't imply PROT_MAX on mprotect at this time. One could make a case for it, but we're never tested it and it's not as clear a case IMO.
sys/sys/syscallsubr.h
178 ↗	(On Diff #59163)	It seems a little odd to me that this is here and not in some sys/vm/* header, but don't have a strong opinion.

Closed by commit rS349608: Use traditional 'p' local to designate td->td_proc in kern_mmap. (authored by kib). · Explain WhyJul 2 2019, 7:01 PM

This revision was automatically updated to reflect the committed changes.

kib added a commit: rS349608: Use traditional 'p' local to designate td->td_proc in kern_mmap..

kib added a commit: rS349609: Control implicit PROT_MAX() using procctl(2) and the FreeBSD note.Jul 2 2019, 7:07 PM

kib added a commit: rS349610: Add implicit PROT_MAX() knob to proccontrol(1)..Jul 2 2019, 7:12 PM

Revision Contents
Changeset List

Path

Size

head/

sys/

vm/

10 lines

Diff 59322

head/sys/vm/vm_mmap.c

Loading...