Looks OK to me. It is as you say a bit ugly, but I think it gets us where we want to be and is the best we can do until sub-packages are supported.

I won't have the time to work on it until next week, but I like the idea

In D30238#679780, @garga wrote:

I won't have the time to work on it until next week, but I like the idea

Any news, anything I can do to help?

In D30238#689919, @grembo wrote:

In D30238#679780, @garga wrote:

I won't have the time to work on it until next week, but I like the idea

Any news, anything I can do to help?

I'm facing some issues on the system I use to test all my ports related stuff. Hopefully it will be fixed today yet and then I'm going to be able to test it and get it committed.

@grembo Patch is not applying after latest changes on git port. Could you please rebase it? I finally found the time to work on it, sorry for the delay

In D30238#697016, @garga wrote:

@grembo Patch is not applying after latest changes on git port. Could you please rebase it? I finally found the time to work on it, sorry for the delay

Should apply now (there were a couple of bigger changes to the port just two days ago, so it was a bit of work to get it back in line). I tested git/git-p4/git-cvs in poudriere testport, git-svn is still running as it takes forever (lots of dependencies, including cmake).

Once this is done, we might consider turning git-lite into git-core and base the git port on it (that way, git-core/lite could become a meaningful port to depend on). But that's some future business. For now, let's focus on landing this change, which should already improve the situation for folks like @bdrewery who need an easy/painless way to have git-svn support.

@garga There is a MOVED entry on git-cvs, seems like there was something python based of that name before. So you would need to take care of this to allow the port to build in bulk (non-testport) mode.

In D30238#697416, @grembo wrote:

@garga There is a MOVED entry on git-cvs, seems like there was something python based of that name before. So you would need to take care of this to allow the port to build in bulk (non-testport) mode.

@garga ping?

In D30238#702932, @grembo wrote:

In D30238#697416, @grembo wrote:

@garga There is a MOVED entry on git-cvs, seems like there was something python based of that name before. So you would need to take care of this to allow the port to build in bulk (non-testport) mode.

@garga ping?

Hello! I'm working on it and making more changes to create more sub packages and make it as much flexible as I can. Unfortunately I don't have lots of free hours as I would like but I'm on it and don't plan to make any other changes on this port before this one

Thanks for the heads-up!