- Update to 0.44
- Reformat Makefile according to portclippy/portfmt
- Fix pkg-plist
PR: 253101
Reported by: otis
Submitted by: otis
Details
Details
- Reviewers
osa swills - Commits
- rP564972: MFH: r564962
rP564962: devel/rlwrap: Update to 0.44
Diff Detail
Diff Detail
- Repository
- rP FreeBSD ports repository
- Lint
No Lint Coverage - Unit
No Test Coverage - Build Status
Buildable 36887 Build 33776: arc lint + arc unit
Event Timeline
Comment Actions
Juraj, is there any specific reason to use the MASTER_SITES in this case when software distributed from GitHub?
Comment Actions
If there was no official release, then GH_ variables should be used to fetch from the specific tag. But as the official release is available, the preferred method is to download the released tarball.
Comment Actions
I've just tried to build the port with the following patch for the original Makefile and everything works fine.
I'd prefer to use GH_TAGNAME instead of switching to MASTER_SITES.
Comment Actions
Somewhere in the Porters Handbook that I can't find right now, it says use the release file if possible. This avoids issues if GitHub re-generates the tarball, which happens sometimes even if there is no release or change in the repo, etc. ie, GitHub has some operational issue and the file is regenerated.
Comment Actions
The WWW link in the pkg-descr seems to no longer work, please update that. Also, no need to specify reported by/submitted by, that's assumed to be the committer if not specified.