devel/rlwrap: Update to 0.44

[otis]

Summary

• Update to 0.44
• Reformat Makefile according to portclippy/portfmt
• Fix pkg-plist

PR: 253101
Reported by: otis
Submitted by: otis

[osa]

Juraj, is there any specific reason to use the MASTER_SITES in this case when software distributed from GitHub?

[otis]

Update MASTER_SITES after upstream renamed release tag to proper value.

[otis]

If there was no official release, then GH_ variables should be used to fetch from the specific tag. But as the official release is available, the preferred method is to download the released tarball.

[osa]

I've just tried to build the port with the following patch for the original Makefile and everything works fine.

patch-Makefile887 BDownload

I'd prefer to use GH_TAGNAME instead of switching to MASTER_SITES.

[swills]

In D28429#636097, @osa wrote:

I've just tried to build the port with the following patch for the original Makefile and everything works fine.

patch-Makefile887 BDownload

I'd prefer to use GH_TAGNAME instead of switching to MASTER_SITES.

Somewhere in the Porters Handbook that I can't find right now, it says use the release file if possible. This avoids issues if GitHub re-generates the tarball, which happens sometimes even if there is no release or change in the repo, etc. ie, GitHub has some operational issue and the file is regenerated.

[swills]

The WWW link in the pkg-descr seems to no longer work, please update that. Also, no need to specify reported by/submitted by, that's assumed to be the committer if not specified.

[otis]

Fix pkg-descr

[otis]

Fix pkg-descr

[osa]

LGTM.