Page MenuHomeFreeBSD

(umaperf 4/7) Use a separate lock for the zone and keg.
ClosedPublic

Authored by jeff on Dec 15 2019, 11:38 PM.
Tags
None
Referenced Files
Unknown Object (File)
Sun, Sep 6, 9:35 AM
Unknown Object (File)
Sat, Sep 5, 11:54 AM
Unknown Object (File)
Sat, Sep 5, 4:47 AM
Unknown Object (File)
Fri, Sep 4, 10:29 PM
Unknown Object (File)
Fri, Sep 4, 9:54 PM
Unknown Object (File)
Fri, Sep 4, 6:16 PM
Unknown Object (File)
Wed, Sep 2, 10:33 PM
Unknown Object (File)
Wed, Sep 2, 6:21 PM
Subscribers

Details

Summary

This is part of a series of patches intended to enable first-touch numa policies for UMA by default. It also reduces the cost of uma_zalloc/zfree by approximately 30% each in my tests.

Zone lock protected a few random things that did not provide any real protection so I eliminated them. Now zone lock effectively synchronizes the bucket lists and counts. So it is used in the cache_alloc()/cache_free() path but not below. These holds are all very short. If this lock is still shown to be contending we could further break the zone lock up by domain with a little effort in the bucket accounting.

This helps with crossdomain free because you may have to drain buckets back to the keg layer. This process will now not hold-up the normal allocation/free path. The introduction of uz_import/uz_release also broke any strong relationship between these two layers.

Diff Detail

Repository
rS FreeBSD src repository - subversion
Lint
Lint Not Applicable
Unit
Tests Not Applicable