Page MenuHomeFreeBSD

Use ATTR_DBM for ATTR_SW_DBM instead of a software bit.
ClosedPublic

Authored by markj on Jul 30 2019, 8:20 PM.
Tags
None
Referenced Files
Unknown Object (File)
Mon, Aug 17, 7:37 PM
Unknown Object (File)
Thu, Aug 13, 12:37 PM
Unknown Object (File)
Thu, Aug 13, 12:37 PM
Unknown Object (File)
Thu, Aug 13, 12:37 PM
Unknown Object (File)
Wed, Aug 12, 3:47 PM
Unknown Object (File)
Wed, Aug 12, 10:19 AM
Unknown Object (File)
Tue, Aug 11, 4:43 PM
Unknown Object (File)
Sun, Aug 9, 9:20 PM
Subscribers

Details

Summary

On ARMv8.0 ATTR_DBM is reserved. But Linux uses it anyway, so I presume
it is safe to do so in FreeBSD as well.

I am torn on whether to keep using "ATTR_SW_DBM" or whether I should
just replace all references with ATTR_SW_DBM. Any preferences?

Diff Detail

Lint
Lint Passed
Unit
No Test Coverage
Build Status
Buildable 25609
Build 24207: arc lint + arc unit

Event Timeline

Do we have access to a machine with hardware DBM support?

In D21121#458634, @alc wrote:

Do we have access to a machine with hardware DBM support?

Not yet. It looks like the thunderx2 does not support hardware DBM or AF management: http://dmesgd.nycbug.org/index.cgi?do=view&id=4798

I am torn on whether to keep using "ATTR_SW_DBM" or whether I should
just replace all references with ATTR_SW_DBM. Any preferences?

No, not really.

In D21121#458634, @alc wrote:

Do we have access to a machine with hardware DBM support?

As far as I know only in the form of a simulator, e.g. the Architecture Envelope Model from https://developer.arm.com/tools-and-software/simulation-models/fixed-virtual-platforms

This revision is now accepted and ready to land.Jul 31 2019, 11:59 AM