Some drivers want the TLS seqno when offload starts. Capture this for them by (ab)using the tls next_seqno field.
Details
Details
Diff Detail
Diff Detail
- Repository
- rG FreeBSD src repository
- Lint
Lint Skipped - Unit
Tests Skipped
Event Timeline
Comment Actions
Maybe to make it clearer we can change the struct to use a union of next_seqno and initial_seqno which won't change the ABI but will let us document it in the header and be more clear about the intent?
Comment Actions
added union for next_seqno / initial offload seqno to provide a better description & preserve ABI, as suggested by @jhb