lang/zig: update to 0.12.0
ClosedPublic
Actions

Authored by bsd_orsolic.org on Apr 30 2024, 4:19 AM.

Details

Reviewers

None

Group Reviewers

Ports Committers
portmgr

Commits

R11:28238a95a3f5: lang/zig: update to 0.12.0
R11:55f0537a0484: lang/zig: adjust CONFLICTS after 98d70399e765
R11:a14183bb8404: lang/zig010: drop unused dependency on archivers/lzma
R11:8c51d3a8ca38: lang/zig: drop unused dependency on archivers/lzma
R11:7a200185378b: lang/zig: pacify check-plist after 8c1e3e605452

Summary

Upgrade zig language to the latest release.

Test Plan

Tested on 14.0-RELEASE and 15.0-CURRENT
Tested with native (x86-64) and cross compilation (RISC-V).

Diff Detail

Repository

R11 FreeBSD ports repository

Lint

Lint Skipped

Unit

Tests Skipped

Event Timeline

bsd_orsolic.org requested review of this revision.Apr 30 2024, 4:19 AM

bsd_orsolic.org created this revision.

Tested with native (x86-64) and cross compilation (RISC-V).

Do you mean it's tested on RISC-V? If so should we update ONLY_FOR_ARCHS field?

In D45024#1027335, @lwhsu wrote:

Tested with native (x86-64) and cross compilation (RISC-V).

Do you mean it's tested on RISC-V? If so should we update ONLY_FOR_ARCHS field?

I tested it with cross-compilation to RISC-V (32 bit MCU, ESP32-C3 chip). Compiler ran on x86-64 computer. I don't have RISC-V FreeBSD capable hardware.

In D45024#1027341, @bsd_orsolic.org wrote:

In D45024#1027335, @lwhsu wrote:

Tested with native (x86-64) and cross compilation (RISC-V).

Do you mean it's tested on RISC-V? If so should we update ONLY_FOR_ARCHS field?

I tested it with cross-compilation to RISC-V (32 bit MCU, ESP32-C3 chip). Compiler ran on x86-64 computer. I don't have RISC-V FreeBSD capable hardware.

Ok, if you want to test zig on FreeBSD, I would recommend building riscv64 and testing with the emulator like qemu-system-riscv64 (emulators/qemu) and spike (emulators/riscv-isa-sim)

Also, this isn't built cleanly in poudriere: https://gist.github.com/lwhsu/cfcbd8881d7a7b745178dcba11568ec6
Please check and fix. Thanks!

Diff updated. Now poudriere doesn't report errors in pkg-plist.
Do you know why stage-qa doesn't report errors, but when run in poudriere it does (with first version of the diff)?

This revision was not accepted when it landed; it landed in state Needs Review.May 20 2024, 2:43 PM

Closed by commit R11:7a200185378b: lang/zig: pacify check-plist after 8c1e3e605452 (authored by bsd_orsolic.org, committed by jbeich). · Explain Why

This revision was automatically updated to reflect the committed changes.

jbeich added a commit: R11:7a200185378b: lang/zig: pacify check-plist after 8c1e3e605452.

jbeich added a commit: R11:a14183bb8404: lang/zig010: drop unused dependency on archivers/lzma.

jbeich added a commit: R11:8c51d3a8ca38: lang/zig: drop unused dependency on archivers/lzma.

jbeich added a commit: R11:55f0537a0484: lang/zig: adjust CONFLICTS after 98d70399e765.

jbeich added a commit: R11:28238a95a3f5: lang/zig: update to 0.12.0.