lang/zig: update to 0.12.0

[bsd_orsolic.org]

Summary

Upgrade zig language to the latest release.

Test Plan

Tested on 14.0-RELEASE and 15.0-CURRENT
Tested with native (x86-64) and cross compilation (RISC-V).

[lwhsu]

Tested with native (x86-64) and cross compilation (RISC-V).

Do you mean it's tested on RISC-V? If so should we update ONLY_FOR_ARCHS field?

[bsd_orsolic.org]

In D45024#1027335, @lwhsu wrote:

Tested with native (x86-64) and cross compilation (RISC-V).

Do you mean it's tested on RISC-V? If so should we update ONLY_FOR_ARCHS field?

I tested it with cross-compilation to RISC-V (32 bit MCU, ESP32-C3 chip). Compiler ran on x86-64 computer. I don't have RISC-V FreeBSD capable hardware.

[lwhsu]

In D45024#1027341, @bsd_orsolic.org wrote:

In D45024#1027335, @lwhsu wrote:

Tested with native (x86-64) and cross compilation (RISC-V).

Do you mean it's tested on RISC-V? If so should we update ONLY_FOR_ARCHS field?

I tested it with cross-compilation to RISC-V (32 bit MCU, ESP32-C3 chip). Compiler ran on x86-64 computer. I don't have RISC-V FreeBSD capable hardware.

Ok, if you want to test zig on FreeBSD, I would recommend building riscv64 and testing with the emulator like qemu-system-riscv64 (emulators/qemu) and spike (emulators/riscv-isa-sim)

Also, this isn't built cleanly in poudriere: https://gist.github.com/lwhsu/cfcbd8881d7a7b745178dcba11568ec6
Please check and fix. Thanks!

[bsd_orsolic.org]

Diff updated. Now poudriere doesn't report errors in pkg-plist.
Do you know why stage-qa doesn't report errors, but when run in poudriere it does (with first version of the diff)?