Page MenuHomeFreeBSD

14.4/errata: Add kernels_autodetect regression
AbandonedPublic

Authored by ziaee on Mon, Mar 9, 1:04 AM.
Tags
None
Referenced Files
Unknown Object (File)
Fri, Mar 13, 7:49 PM
Unknown Object (File)
Fri, Mar 13, 1:25 PM
Unknown Object (File)
Wed, Mar 11, 7:11 AM
Subscribers

Details

Summary

PR: 293654
Reported by: leres, cperciva

Diff Detail

Repository
R9 FreeBSD doc repository
Lint
Lint Skipped
Unit
Tests Skipped
Build Status
Buildable 71276
Build 68159: arc lint + arc unit

Event Timeline

ziaee requested review of this revision.Mon, Mar 9, 1:04 AM
ziaee created this revision.
website/content/en/releases/14.4R/errata.adoc
66

if we like to keep the style from 15.0 Errata, it would be good to place every sentence in new line in the final output. It needs '+' in the end of every line.

66
67
68
This revision is now accepted and ready to land.Mon, Mar 9, 3:48 AM

if we like to keep the style from 15.0 Errata, it would be good to place every sentence in new line in the final output. It needs '+' in the end of every line.

(D55751 does not have this issue)

if we like to keep the style from 15.0 Errata, it would be good to place every sentence in new line in the final output. It needs '+' in the end of every line.

(D55751 does not have this issue)

Are these reviews (D55751 and D55753) considered as two different issues (loader(8) and loader_lua(8)) linked to the same PR? Should we choose only one of them?

if we like to keep the style from 15.0 Errata, it would be good to place every sentence in new line in the final output. It needs '+' in the end of every line.

(D55751 does not have this issue)

Are these reviews (D55751 and D55753) considered as two different issues (loader(8) and loader_lua(8)) linked to the same PR? Should we choose only one of them?

Yes, I believe D55753 is a duplicate of D55751.

Yes, I believe D55753 is a duplicate of D55751.

Would you like me to land D55751 as it was in the original issue description?

Would you like me to land D55751 as it was in the original issue description?

Definitely. I didn't notice Craig's review when I made this one.