Page MenuHomeFreeBSD

ctld: Fix assertion against the wrong field
ClosedPublic

Authored by jhb on Jan 23 2025, 3:50 PM.
Tags
None
Referenced Files
Unknown Object (File)
Sat, Jul 18, 10:30 PM
Unknown Object (File)
Sat, Jul 18, 1:01 AM
Unknown Object (File)
Sun, Jul 12, 12:14 AM
Unknown Object (File)
Wed, Jul 8, 2:18 AM
Unknown Object (File)
Thu, Jul 2, 11:53 AM
Unknown Object (File)
Jun 5 2026, 2:01 AM
Unknown Object (File)
May 14 2026, 12:40 PM
Unknown Object (File)
May 14 2026, 1:42 AM
Subscribers

Diff Detail

Repository
rG FreeBSD src repository
Lint
Lint Not Applicable
Unit
Tests Not Applicable

Event Timeline

jhb requested review of this revision.Jan 23 2025, 3:50 PM

I guess this is OK, but I haven't ever done anything with the discovery code, so I don't know how it's supposed to work.

This revision is now accepted and ready to land.Jan 23 2025, 4:15 PM

yea, this field is a pointer.

usr.sbin/ctld/discovery.c
164

As Warner noted, pg_discovery_filter is an integer field that holds one of the PG_FILTER_* values (an enum in essence), while pg_discovery_auth_group is a pointer to a struct auth_group. This is a type mismatch comparing a pointer to an integer. Not sure why the compiler didn't complain about this earlier. Maybe if PG_FILTER_UNKNOWN is 0 then it gets treated as NULL.

166

Here you can see the PG_FILTER_ values being compared against the integer field.

183

Here you can see the pointer dereferenced.

This revision was automatically updated to reflect the committed changes.