expand_number: Tighten check of unit.

[delphij]

Summary

The current code silently ignores characters after the unit as long
the unit themselves were recognized. This commit makes expand_number(3)
to fail with EINVAL if buf did not terminate after the unit character.

While I am there, also write a few test cases to validate the behavior.

MFC-after: 2 weeks

Test Plan

Run the test cases

[emaste]

lib/libutil/expand_number.c

78–81

Preexisting issue, but looks like we need to mention b in the man page.
I'm also not sure if b should mean shift = 0 or should be an optional ignored character (i.e., so that 1k and 1kb are treated identically)

91–92

it looks like this does not need a line break?

lib/libutil/tests/expand_number_test.c

49

further to my comment above I'd say this correctly tests existing behaviour, but it seems as if 1kb ought to be an accepted value

[delphij]

lib/libutil/expand_number.c

78–81

Actually I wasn't very sure why we supported b, but that was a good point. In the manual page change I'll say that the usage of b is discouraged (because some other utilities treats b as "block" and the result may be confusing).

[delphij]

Reflect reviewer comments.

[delphij]

Make license for test explicit per guidelines.

[emaste]

lib/libutil/tests/expand_number_test.c

54

should we check both b and B perhaps?

[ngie]

LGTM