Page MenuHomeFreeBSD

efi: mark as broken on i386
ClosedPublic

Authored by imp on May 8 2023, 8:29 PM.
Tags
None
Referenced Files
F172077440: D40011.id121707.diff
Tue, Sep 15, 11:53 PM
F172076989: D40011.id121883.diff
Tue, Sep 15, 11:47 PM
F172076211: D40011.diff
Tue, Sep 15, 11:35 PM
Unknown Object (File)
Tue, Sep 8, 2:27 PM
Unknown Object (File)
Sun, Sep 6, 5:05 AM
Unknown Object (File)
Sun, Sep 6, 3:24 AM
Unknown Object (File)
Fri, Sep 4, 11:50 AM
Unknown Object (File)
Thu, Sep 3, 6:01 PM
Subscribers

Details

Summary

We're never going to support EFI booting on i386 (32-bit). Start to
decommission it, since it's never worked.

Sponsored by: Netflix

Diff Detail

Repository
rG FreeBSD src repository
Lint
Lint Not Applicable
Unit
Tests Not Applicable

Event Timeline

imp requested review of this revision.May 8 2023, 8:29 PM
This revision is now accepted and ready to land.May 8 2023, 8:35 PM

Yeah. In the past I would have argued that we should work on support it (back when Intel had viable contemporary 32-bit hw and a 32-bit Tianocore to go with it) but at this point i386's future overall is not clear and we're not going to put effort into this.

Yeah. In the past I would have argued that we should work on support it (back when Intel had viable contemporary 32-bit hw and a 32-bit Tianocore to go with it) but at this point i386's future overall is not clear and we're not going to put effort into this.

With illumos loader I actually made working 32-bit loader.efi to start 64-bit kernel (on hw supporting that), but thats about how far we went as illumos did drop 32-bit kernel on x86. So it is/was basically as interesting thought game... still dead end, I'm afraid:)

This revision was automatically updated to reflect the committed changes.