Page MenuHomeFreeBSD

efi: mark as broken on i386
ClosedPublic

Authored by imp on May 8 2023, 8:29 PM.
Tags
None
Referenced Files
F168077176: D40011.id121883.diff
Wed, Aug 26, 6:46 AM
F168036931: D40011.id.diff
Wed, Aug 26, 1:38 AM
F168028983: D40011.diff
Wed, Aug 26, 12:35 AM
Unknown Object (File)
Fri, Aug 14, 3:02 AM
Unknown Object (File)
Tue, Aug 4, 9:13 AM
Unknown Object (File)
Tue, Aug 4, 4:48 AM
Unknown Object (File)
Mon, Aug 3, 3:20 AM
Unknown Object (File)
Jul 20 2026, 11:51 PM
Subscribers

Details

Summary

We're never going to support EFI booting on i386 (32-bit). Start to
decommission it, since it's never worked.

Sponsored by: Netflix

Diff Detail

Repository
rG FreeBSD src repository
Lint
Lint Not Applicable
Unit
Tests Not Applicable

Event Timeline

imp requested review of this revision.May 8 2023, 8:29 PM
This revision is now accepted and ready to land.May 8 2023, 8:35 PM

Yeah. In the past I would have argued that we should work on support it (back when Intel had viable contemporary 32-bit hw and a 32-bit Tianocore to go with it) but at this point i386's future overall is not clear and we're not going to put effort into this.

Yeah. In the past I would have argued that we should work on support it (back when Intel had viable contemporary 32-bit hw and a 32-bit Tianocore to go with it) but at this point i386's future overall is not clear and we're not going to put effort into this.

With illumos loader I actually made working 32-bit loader.efi to start 64-bit kernel (on hw supporting that), but thats about how far we went as illumos did drop 32-bit kernel on x86. So it is/was basically as interesting thought game... still dead end, I'm afraid:)

This revision was automatically updated to reflect the committed changes.