security/openssl-agent: OpenSSL key agent and client utils OpenSSL key agent and client utilities. The aim of these utilities is to provide an openssl-rsautl(1) drop-in replacement for performing cryptographic operations using a private key that is unlocked for the session, similar to OpenSSH's ssh-agent(1). The port's author is known to the maintainer but wishes not to be named. Obtained from: anonymous author Approved by: ... (mentor)
Details
Details
Tested with Poudriere on i386 amd64 FreeBSD 12.4 13.1. Arm64 tests pending.
See test results at: http://fuz.su/~fuz/freebsd/batch2
Diff Detail
Diff Detail
- Repository
- rP FreeBSD ports repository
- Lint
No Lint Coverage - Unit
No Test Coverage - Build Status
Buildable 49842 Build 46733: arc lint + arc unit
Event Timeline
| security/openssl-agent/Makefile | ||
|---|---|---|
| 16 | is -V -j ${MAKE_JOBS_NUMBER} -J ${MAKE_JOBS_NUMBER} missing here? | |
Comment Actions
Commit msg should be:
<category>/<portname>: New port: Short description <portname long description> <WWW url>
IMO no need to mention Obtained from: anonymous author.
Comment Actions
The port build completes in 18 seconds, so I didn't check for parallel build issues. I am not too familiar with build2 and would like to avoid revisiting the port as it works for now.
Will adjust the commit message on commit. It is important to me not claim other people's work as my own, hence the Obtained from:.
Comment Actions
Approved.
| security/openssl-agent/Makefile | ||
|---|---|---|
| 16 | Looking at devel/build2 and this it make sense to add a USES mk file. That way we would automatically have the correct options for all ports that use it. Given that currently it's only two? ports this certainly is not a requirement. For completeness it might be nice to use the MAKE_JOBS here, but also not a requirement with 18 seconds build time. | |
Comment Actions
| security/openssl-agent/Makefile | ||
|---|---|---|
| 16 | My doubt is why is it used in do-install target, maybe a clean up could be made. | |