devel/build2: Toolchain for building and packaging C++ code
ClosedPublic
Actions

Authored by fuz on Feb 16 2023, 1:06 PM.

Details

Reviewers

eduardo
flo

Commits

R11:f68d0ee31c93: devel/build2: Toolchain for building and packaging C++ code

Summary

devel/build2: Toolchain for building and packaging C++ code

build2 is an open source (MIT), cross-platform build toolchain that aims
to approximate Rust Cargo's convenience for developing and packaging
C/C++ projects while providing more depth and flexibility, especially in
the build system.

libodb and libodb-sqlite are currently bundled in this port.  These are
planned to be unbundled in a future commit.

The port's author is known to the maintainer but wishes not to be named.

Obtained from:	anonymous author
Approved by:	... (mentor)

This port might also break on armv7, but my test machine is currently
too loaded to verify. Will update with a BROKEN_armv7 once I manage to
find out.

Test Plan

Tested with Poudriere on i386 amd64 FreeBSD 12.4 13.1. Arm64 tests pending.
See test results at: http://fuz.su/~fuz/freebsd/batch2

Diff Detail

Repository

R11 FreeBSD ports repository

Lint

Lint Not Applicable

Unit

Tests Not Applicable

Event Timeline

fuz created this revision.Feb 16 2023, 1:06 PM

Herald added a subscriber: mat. · View Herald TranscriptFeb 16 2023, 1:06 PM

fuz requested review of this revision.Feb 16 2023, 1:06 PM

Harbormaster completed remote builds in B49841: Diff 117438.Feb 16 2023, 1:06 PM

Port works ok on armv7.

Commit msg should be:

<category>/<portname>: New port: Short description

<portname long description>
<WWW url>

IMO no need to mention Obtained from: anonymous author.

Will adjust the commit message on commit. It is important to me not claim other people's work as my own, hence the Obtained from:.

Is there anything blocking the last three DRs (this one, D38630, and D38634)? I would like to commit these so I can start with the next batch.

In D38629#879848, @eduardo wrote:

IMO no need to mention Obtained from: anonymous author.

Anonymous submissions have been a topic of discussion in the past, I currently don't recall the outcome. I do like how Robert handles it, as it shows that the submitter wants to stay anonymous, but is known to the committer.