This does not include entries for changes that were included in 12.2
release.
Details
- Reviewers
gjb emaste - Commits
- R9:05314f45e14b: Add entries from the stable/13/RELNOTES file.
Diff Detail
- Repository
- R9 FreeBSD doc repository
- Lint
Lint Not Applicable - Unit
Tests Not Applicable
Event Timeline
website/content/en/releases/13.0R/relnotes.adoc | ||
---|---|---|
123 | not yet enforced, perhaps | |
151 | As discussed on IRC perhaps a more sweeping comment on a.out retirement | |
161 | we might want to mention "obsolete" here instead of (or along with) unsupported | |
267 | Maybe also "obsolete" e1000 is old, ed is obsolete | |
419 | Maybe "as a compiled-in default" or such, or "SCTP support has been modularized and is no longer compiled into GENERIC by default"? As is sounds more like it is being removed. | |
442 | Maybe some reference to the hardware that was supported by armv5 and when it was removed? |
website/content/en/releases/13.0R/relnotes.adoc | ||
---|---|---|
123 | We probably won't toggle the default in 13.0's lifetime though, so I'm not sure "yet" makes sense in that context. When we do toggle the default in a future release that will probably be its own item. | |
151 | Agreed, but I think that should probably be a followup. For this commit I've tried to limit to describing the relevant entries from RELNOTES without expanding things too much farther than that. I have expanded a few though such as including the OpenSSL commit hash in the KTLS one. | |
419 | I've done a variant of the latter: SCTP support is now available as a new [.filename]#sctp.ko# kernel module and is no longer compiled into GENERIC by default. gitref:e64080e79c53[repository=src] {{< sponsored "The FreeBSD Foundation" >}} | |
442 | I'm happy to defer to @imp on fleshing this out further in a followup. The comment in RELNOTES is: r356263: armv5 support has been removed from FreeBSD. |
Overall LGTM, I am happy to propose a followup for things I suggested/pondered.
website/content/en/releases/13.0R/relnotes.adoc | ||
---|---|---|
123 | Yes, maybe "currently not enforced by default" - i.e., I would like to indicate this is not necessarily our desired end state. I can propose a followup change. |