Page MenuHomeFreeBSD

Create port for libpololu.
ClosedPublic

Authored by jonathan on May 22 2015, 2:35 PM.
Tags
None
Referenced Files
Unknown Object (File)
Dec 23 2023, 5:06 PM
Unknown Object (File)
Dec 20 2023, 2:50 AM
Unknown Object (File)
Dec 10 2023, 3:33 AM
Unknown Object (File)
Nov 2 2023, 7:40 AM
Unknown Object (File)
Jul 4 2023, 11:13 AM
Unknown Object (File)
Jul 3 2023, 7:56 AM
Unknown Object (File)
Jun 28 2023, 5:16 AM
Unknown Object (File)
May 10 2023, 9:44 PM
Subscribers
None

Details

Summary

This is a library used to control Pololu AVR-based robots such as the
Pololu 3pi (used for introductory programming education at Memorial
University of Newfoundland and, I believe, other places too).

Diff Detail

Repository
rP FreeBSD ports repository
Lint
Lint Not Applicable
Unit
Tests Not Applicable

Event Timeline

jonathan retitled this revision from to Create port for libpololu..
jonathan updated this object.
jonathan edited the test plan for this revision. (Show Details)
jonathan added reviewers: mat, antoine.
devel/libpololu-avr/Makefile
6–7 ↗(On Diff #5559)

Why twice ?

10 ↗(On Diff #5559)

If it *is* a zip file, you also need USES=zip

22 ↗(On Diff #5559)

As you're adding -avr everywhere, why not name the port libpololu-avr directly ? It would simplify a lot of things.

jonathan marked 3 inline comments as done.
  • Remove duplicate MASTER_SITES.
  • Rename port to libpololu-avr.
  • Add USES=zip, since the distfile is a zip file.
mat edited edge metadata.

This looks good, feel free to commit it with the USES line modified as per the comment I added.

Approved by: mat
devel/libpololu-avr/Makefile
22 ↗(On Diff #7230)

You should remove this line, and add gmake to the USES line, because otherwise, the port won't depend on gmake, and it won't be there when it'll be built :-)

This revision is now accepted and ready to land.Jul 23 2015, 10:51 PM

Hi @mat,

Thanks very much! Just to be clear, as a src-only committer, does your comment mean that I ought to commit the change to the ports tree with an Approved by: mat line?

Thanks,

Jon

Thanks very much! Just to be clear, as a src-only committer, does your comment mean that I ought to commit the change to the ports tree with an Approved by: mat line?

Absolutely.

This revision was automatically updated to reflect the committed changes.
jonathan marked an inline comment as done.

Last issue fixed; port added in r397538. Thanks for your help!