Page MenuHomeFreeBSD

Support URI scheme for root-path in netbooting
ClosedPublic

Authored by bapt on May 26 2017, 8:59 PM.
Tags
None
Referenced Files
Unknown Object (File)
Tue, Dec 10, 3:15 PM
Unknown Object (File)
Mon, Dec 2, 6:38 PM
Unknown Object (File)
Mon, Dec 2, 2:05 AM
Unknown Object (File)
Fri, Nov 29, 3:39 PM
Unknown Object (File)
Oct 28 2024, 2:42 AM
Unknown Object (File)
Oct 19 2024, 2:26 PM
Unknown Object (File)
Oct 15 2024, 10:41 AM
Unknown Object (File)
Oct 6 2024, 12:33 AM
Subscribers

Details

Summary

It supports the following scheme:
compat with before all the changes:
NFS for:
root-path = /path
root-path = <ip>:/path

New schemes:
tftpfs for
tftp:/path
tftp://ip/path

nfs for
nfs:/path
nfs://ip/path

Diff Detail

Repository
rS FreeBSD src repository - subversion
Lint
Lint Passed
Unit
No Test Coverage
Build Status
Buildable 9522
Build 9971: arc lint + arc unit

Event Timeline

Other than the comment expansion request I like this, very clean, very easy to understand, and even easier to expand in the future.

Other than the comment expansion request I like this, very clean, very easy to understand, and even easier to expand in the future.

You mean you want more comments in that code? if yes I can do that yes :)

sys/boot/common/dev_net.c
431

for pointer arithmetics it is good to use ((uintptr_t)val - (uintptr_t)ptr) - just to be at safe side, because we do have 64 and 32 bit builds there.

442

There is still the confusion about return types; we do get n_long as address from inet_addr, yet this function is stated to return uint32_t. And this may be problem with 64-bit binary.

Better pointer arithmetics

bapt added inline comments.
sys/boot/common/dev_net.c
442

I agree and this should be addressed in a second commit imho

Use size_t instead of unsigned long

This revision is now accepted and ready to land.May 27 2017, 12:01 PM
This revision was automatically updated to reflect the committed changes.
In D10947#226718, @bapt wrote:

Other than the comment expansion request I like this, very clean, very easy to understand, and even easier to expand in the future.

You mean you want more comments in that code? if yes I can do that yes :)

Yes please, basically this function was re-written and enhanced without any change to the describing block comment that should exists before each function in the FreeBSD source tree. (see style(9)).

head/sys/boot/common/dev_net.c
391 ↗(On Diff #28900)

The above is the block comment for the net_parse_rootpath() function, it is rather out of date now that this function has been greatly enhanced, so yes I would like to see a new block comment that more accurately describes what this function now does.