User Details
- User Since
- Apr 18 2014, 5:23 AM (577 w, 5 d)
Yesterday
Thu, May 8
Wed, May 7
While this looks good, I think the commit log should be way more verbose.
Tue, May 6
Mon, May 5
I love this, I am wondering if -i is the right option, the natural option I would have been looking for is -f for force, rather that -i for ignore, I don't think it is a big deal, and I am fine with -i
Wed, Apr 30
Tue, Apr 29
Fri, Apr 25
Thu, Apr 24
Wed, Apr 23
address @emaste comment
Sat, Apr 19
Thu, Apr 17
Wed, Apr 16
After more testing:
Apr 11 2025
Apr 10 2025
I get the what, but I don't get the why ? why would we want to do that, you are the first one proposing such change in a decade at least
Apr 9 2025
I think the requirement for "recent" amd64 machines is ok, Nehalem is from 17 years ago also people with older CPUs can still install their own linux chroot if needed. (still an entry in UPDATING and probably also pkg-message would be nice).
Apr 2 2025
with @ziaee changes incorporated
I think you will need to make the transition period longer than current as it is already in 14.x or this should be merged in 14.3 as well. It might be interesting to issue a warning when ':' is encountered so users know they should upgrade their setup (could be in a separate commit)
Apr 1 2025
Mar 28 2025
Mar 27 2025
Mar 21 2025
the -o is on purpose to preserve interractive prompt, if you want to prevent that, then you need to make this conditionnal to BATCH: if BATCH then xargs pkg install -yA if not xargs -o pkg install -A