Page MenuHomeFreeBSD

Remove vestiges of ia64, alpha, and pc98 from our documentation and websites
AbandonedPublic

Authored by bcr on Apr 19 2019, 8:45 PM.
Tags
None
Referenced Files
Unknown Object (File)
Thu, May 2, 9:01 PM
Unknown Object (File)
Thu, May 2, 9:00 PM
Unknown Object (File)
Thu, May 2, 4:59 PM
Unknown Object (File)
Jan 5 2024, 5:26 PM
Unknown Object (File)
Nov 7 2023, 6:28 PM
Unknown Object (File)
Oct 6 2023, 5:24 PM
Unknown Object (File)
Sep 21 2023, 5:38 PM
Unknown Object (File)
Sep 11 2023, 4:53 AM
Subscribers
None

Details

Reviewers
jhb
emaste
imp
hrs
Summary

Triggered by PR216699, I started looking for references of pc98 in our doc tree. Along the way, I came upon some old remnants of alpha and ia64 architectures we once supported, so I removed those as well.
I did a full build of the docs and website to catch any dangling references to those.

I was not sure about the build server section, so I made a best guess edit.

Test Plan

a) Apply the patch on the head checkout of the doc tree
b) go to en_US.ISO8859-1/htdocs and run "make"
c) check the removed pages and edits

Diff Detail

Lint
Lint Skipped
Unit
Tests Skipped
Build Status
Buildable 23777

Event Timeline

en_US.ISO8859-1/books/developers-handbook/testing/chapter.xml
428–429

Is this still true?

I think most of this shouldn't be removed. The PR is quite a bit wrong, too since it is worried about the Tiers chapter in the CG saying that pc98 was removed in 12. However, 11.x is still a supported release and we should still be documenting pc98. I think keeping the small, stub pages for removed architectures in their current state listing when they were supported is also helpful on balance. They are clearly marked as unsupported on the platforms page. To Ed's point, I wonder how current any of the sentex machine list is.

en_US.ISO8859-1/htdocs/platforms/index.xml
89

This mailing list isn't dead yet (though it probably should be). I think it isn't useful to leave placeholder entries here noting when this was supported in the past. Actually, looking at the content of these pages, they are generally accurate and reflect the state of the ports being removed, etc. This is also a section of "unsupported architectures".

98

11 is still a supported branch, so this removal here is definitely premature.

Thanks John for your feedback. In light of this, I think it is best to abandon this revision.

en_US.ISO8859-1/books/developers-handbook/testing/chapter.xml
428–429

I have no idea or insight into this and my google-foo could not find anything conclusive.